International Conference on Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography 2019 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2537104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving exposure latitudes and aligning best focus through pitch by curing M3D phase effects with controlled aberrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To simplify this step, a Telecentric Sigma Point Source (TS-PS) is used as an illumination source. For a TS-PS, NILS remains constant as a function of focus [23]. This eliminates the necessity of an extra variable (focus), resulting in faster simulations.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To simplify this step, a Telecentric Sigma Point Source (TS-PS) is used as an illumination source. For a TS-PS, NILS remains constant as a function of focus [23]. This eliminates the necessity of an extra variable (focus), resulting in faster simulations.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation metrics NILS, TCE, BFV and TtS have a strong dependence on the choice of illumination. Franke et al [23] suggests using either an inner half leaf or an outer half leaf shaped dipole to observe an increment in NILS for Ta-based absorbers. Similarly, a two-dimensional incision resulting in quarter poles for quasar illumination is also recommended for contact holes.…”
Section: 𝑇ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑇𝑝𝑇) = 𝑁𝐼𝐿𝑆 √𝑇𝑡𝑆 Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M3D induced phase deformation has been regarded as one of the most significant issues in EUV [11][12][13][14][15] . Phase shift happens when the light travels between media with a difference in refractive index and depends on the angle of incidence.…”
Section: Absorber Materials For Mitigation Of Mask 3d Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can have a significant impact on telecentricity error, best focus (BF) shift, and through slit printability issues at wafer level. [4][5][6][7] To mitigate M3D effects, various alternative masks were studied and proposed. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Available today, low-n masks are expected to have different imaging performance with respect to traditional Ta-based absorber (ABS) mask: higher normalized image log slope (NILS), M3D effects reduction for carefully selected biases, and reduction in dose to size due to larger mask biasing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%