2003
DOI: 10.1785/0120020215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Epicentral and Magnitude Estimation of Earthquakes from T Phases by Considering the Excitation Function

Abstract: A standard technique for locating events with T phases is to pick the peak energy of T phases as the arrival time, then proceed as if it was an unscattered phase originating at the epicenter. The peak energy arrival time, however, can shift to different parts of the wave train due to incoherent scattering. We show that a 50% reduction in variance relative to picks of peak arrival times can be achieved by fitting an assumed functional shape to the log of the entire envelope of the T phase. We test the stability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the T-phase location does not coincide with a point on the seafloor directly above the earthquake hypocenter. There have been several efforts to derive a relationship between seismic magnitude and acoustic magnitude [Dziak et al, 1997;Dziak, 2001;Fox et al, 2001;Bohnenstiehl, 2001;Pulli and Upton, 2002;Yang and Forsyth, 2003;Pan andDziewonski, 2005]. There are several problems, however, because in the past large magnitude earthquakes were clipped by the hydrophone sensors (mb > 4.7 [Fox et al, 2001]) making the estimate of T-phase magnitude unreliable (this problem is being eliminated with the larger dynamic range in more recent hydrophone systems).…”
Section: Acoustics Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, the T-phase location does not coincide with a point on the seafloor directly above the earthquake hypocenter. There have been several efforts to derive a relationship between seismic magnitude and acoustic magnitude [Dziak et al, 1997;Dziak, 2001;Fox et al, 2001;Bohnenstiehl, 2001;Pulli and Upton, 2002;Yang and Forsyth, 2003;Pan andDziewonski, 2005]. There are several problems, however, because in the past large magnitude earthquakes were clipped by the hydrophone sensors (mb > 4.7 [Fox et al, 2001]) making the estimate of T-phase magnitude unreliable (this problem is being eliminated with the larger dynamic range in more recent hydrophone systems).…”
Section: Acoustics Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source of the T-phase therefore may be a large area of the seafloor that includes water depths above and below the critical depth (a broad area of insonification is also discussed by de Groot-Hedlin andOrcutt [1999, 2001] and Yang and Forsyth [2003]). Until the mechanisms of seismic energy coupling into the water column and conversion to acoustic energy are understood (whether it can be explained by ray or wave theory) this problem will remain.…”
Section: Received Level Of T-phases Versus Event Location Water Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, these new studies have recorded important data regarding natural earthquakegenerated T-waves, which has led to a wide variety of novel seismic applications for these acoustic phases propagating through seawater. For example, T-phases have been used to locate remote earthquake epicenters that are situated far out in the deep ocean with a high degree of accuracy (Yang and Forsyth 2003). In another study, T-phases recorded using a small hydroacoustic array were used to study the pattern of rupture propagation and the geographic extent of the source rupture for the M w = 9.0, 2004 Sumatra earthquake (Guilbert et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%