2000
DOI: 10.1177/0734371x0002000104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Employee Acceptance Toward Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay Systems

Abstract: This paper reports the attitudinal findings of an ongoing study of county government professionals regarding a newly implemented performance appraisal and merit pay system More specifically, the study explores whether these attitudes change from before to after implementation ofthese systems Finally, the study examines whether leadership credibility and other variables in any way enhance the chances for success in implementing these human resource technologies The findings indicate, for example, that leader cr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has emphasized the importance of leader motivation in the success of the merit pay and performance appraisal systems (Gabris and Ihrke, 2000).…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has emphasized the importance of leader motivation in the success of the merit pay and performance appraisal systems (Gabris and Ihrke, 2000).…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons behind the perceptions are varied and sometimes difficult to identify, but include low levels of organisational trust (Condrey and Brudney, 1992), lack of transparency in the systems for employees (Egger-Peitler, Hammerschmid and Meyer, 2007), lack of trust in performance-rating systems (Kellough and Selden, 1997), and lack of leadership credibility (Gabris and Ihrke, 2000). Finally, regardless of organisational level, improvements in performance measurement and management that are independent of pay incentives may account for performance increases by improving goal setting.…”
Section: Contextual Factors Affecting Performance-based Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semakin beragam level penilai kinerja dan mekanisme penilaian kinerja maka akan semakin obyektif penilaiannya dan diharapkan semakin kecil penerimaan perilaku tuna fungsinya. Sistem penilaian kinerja terkadang dapat berjalan tidak lancar, salah satunya karena tidak adanya rasa memiliki karena karyawan tidak dilibatkan dalam proses sehingga mereka tidak terlatih, serta perbedaan kredibilitas atasan sebagai penilai (Gabris & Ihrke 2000;Grote 2002). Di sisi lain faktor subjektifitas seperti diskriminasi dalam lingkungan kerja, budaya, ras, jenis kelamin, struktur organisasi, stereotip umum, distorsi persepsi, dan perilaku sosial juga dapat mempengaruhi (Millmore, (Hair et al, 1998).…”
Section: Hubungan Antara Penilai Kinerja Auditor Dengan Penerimaan Peunclassified