2020
DOI: 10.1109/tmrb.2020.3014517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving EMG Signal Change Point Detection for Low SNR by Using Extended Teager-Kaiser Energy Operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outcomes are reported in the lower four rows of Table IV. Results in this four-range subsets are directly compared with results achieved by the following four different onset-detection algorithms in the same 52-signal dataset and reported in [44]: a method based on the doublethreshold statistical algorithm, DT [23]; the wavelet approach introduced in [39], WLT; the procedure founded on the CUSUM logic [46], CUSUM; and the recent approach grounded on the profile-likelihood maximization, employing discrete Fibonacci search, PROLIFIC [47]. Two filtering procedures are also considered (TKEO and ETKEO).…”
Section: B Real Semg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Outcomes are reported in the lower four rows of Table IV. Results in this four-range subsets are directly compared with results achieved by the following four different onset-detection algorithms in the same 52-signal dataset and reported in [44]: a method based on the doublethreshold statistical algorithm, DT [23]; the wavelet approach introduced in [39], WLT; the procedure founded on the CUSUM logic [46], CUSUM; and the recent approach grounded on the profile-likelihood maximization, employing discrete Fibonacci search, PROLIFIC [47]. Two filtering procedures are also considered (TKEO and ETKEO).…”
Section: B Real Semg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of offset timing is not computed, given that the ground-truth offset is not available. The choice of this dataset has been driven by the following considerations: it is a large and complete sEMG dataset available for free; it includes a reliable ground truth for onset detection, which is already used and tested in previous studies [19,44,47]; the peculiarities of knee extension and elbow flexion allow a simple and accurate visual detection of the muscle onset and, consequently, reliable identification of the ground truth; results of the application to this dataset of four onset-detection techniques and two filters are available for a direct comparison [44]. A recent and exciting study proposes an onset and offset detection algorithm for muscle activation validated during hand-close movement of 10 subjects [27].…”
Section: B Real Semg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these methods suffer from two main limitations: (i) the extraction of the onset/offset time instants rely on the extraction of time- and frequency-domain features which may not be sufficient to properly assess dynamic muscle activity and (ii) their performance are strongly affected by the amount of noise superimposed to the sEMG signal. Even if different studies proposing models able to efficiently work even at very low SNR of sEMG signals have been published in the last years [ 13 , 31 , 50 ], these methods still suffer from the first of the above-mentioned limitations (i.e., the necessity of a feature extraction step before muscle activation interval detection).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In microwave radar, radar signal processing is usually full of challenges, under non-ideal conditions including lower signal-to-clutter-and-noise ratio (SCNR) [28] and interference [29]. Similarly, the low SCNR is also a major problem in the respiration signal detection via UWB radar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%