1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4290(97)00033-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving efficiency of water use for irrigated rice in a semi-arid tropical environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
98
2
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
98
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrigation water use of rice grown on beds with intermittent irrigation until two weeks before panicle initiation, followed by continuous fl ooding, was similar to water use of dry-seeded rice on the fl at with continuous fl ooding commencing about one month after sowing . This is in contrast with fi ndings on a more permeable soil in semi-arid tropical northern Queensland where irrigation water use of rice on beds with saturated soil culture was 32% less than fl ooded rice on the fl at due to reduced percolation losses, which were considerable (Borrell et al, 1997). Studies in the USA have also shown considerable water savings with furrow irrigated rice on beds (Tracy et al, 1993;Vories et al, 2002).…”
Section: Reducing Seepage Percolation and Evaporation Losses In Rw Fmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Irrigation water use of rice grown on beds with intermittent irrigation until two weeks before panicle initiation, followed by continuous fl ooding, was similar to water use of dry-seeded rice on the fl at with continuous fl ooding commencing about one month after sowing . This is in contrast with fi ndings on a more permeable soil in semi-arid tropical northern Queensland where irrigation water use of rice on beds with saturated soil culture was 32% less than fl ooded rice on the fl at due to reduced percolation losses, which were considerable (Borrell et al, 1997). Studies in the USA have also shown considerable water savings with furrow irrigated rice on beds (Tracy et al, 1993;Vories et al, 2002).…”
Section: Reducing Seepage Percolation and Evaporation Losses In Rw Fmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Water management for rice : There are numerous reports of large irrigation water savings when changing from continuously fl ooded rice to saturated soil culture to alternate wetting and drying, but yields decrease as soil water content declines below saturation (Sandhu et al, 1980;Thompson 1984, 1985;Borrell et al, 1997;Xu 1999;Bouman and Tuong 2001;Bouman et al, 2002). However, many studies throughout India and China have shown that continuous ponding is not necessary to maintain rice yields at reasonable levels (Sandhu et al, 1980;Sandhu 1987 p. 66 in Hira andKhera 2000;Chaudhary 1997;Xu 1999;Belder et al, 2004;Tuong et al, 2004).…”
Section: Reducing Seepage Percolation and Evaporation Losses In Rw Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, two approaches have been taken to characterize the relationship between weather inputs and rice yields. First, in agronomic studies, usually involv-ing laboratory or experimental fields, rice plants are placed under different types of environmental stresses and physiological responses are measured (e.g., Borrell et al 1997;Homma et al 2004;Yin et al 1996). An extension of this approach is to use field data to calibrate crop models that simulate the physiological growth process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, crop, land and water management practices were the main considerations to increase rice's water productivity (defined here as the amount of grains produced per unit water supplied by irrigation and rainfall). Several water-saving technologies have been developed that aim to reduce non-beneficial water flows from rice fields during crop growth, namely seepage, percolation and evaporation (Bouman and Tuong 2001): saturated soil culture (Borrell et al 1997), alternate wetting and drying (Tabbal et al 2002), groundcover systems (Liu et al 2005) and aerobic rice . In addition, reducing the duration of land preparation and shallow tillage significantly reduce the total water input for wetland preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%