2008
DOI: 10.1504/ijamc.2008.018507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Educational Multimedia selection process using group decision support systems

Abstract: Educational Multimedia (EMM) is becoming a mature and integral part of teaching and learning systems, mainly due to its ability improve teaching and learning. However, EMM selection and evaluation for higher education is a complex and interdisciplinary problem characterised by uncertainty, dynamics, explicit and implicit knowledge and constraints, and involvement of different stakeholders. In this work, a domain-based web oriented Group Decision Support System (GDSS) is proposed for the selection and continuou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the fact that CLIX was originally designed for corporate e‐learning settings, whereas Blackboard and Moodle were originally designed for educational settings. Other studies have supplemented decision support models with models that prioritize user functional and technical requirements (Abdelhakim & Shirmohammadi 2008; Terawaki 2009). Still others view LMS as standardized products with similar generic tools such as quizzes/tests and communication and collaboration spaces, and emphasize implementation success case studies from peer organizations as the primary decision‐making drivers (Black et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the fact that CLIX was originally designed for corporate e‐learning settings, whereas Blackboard and Moodle were originally designed for educational settings. Other studies have supplemented decision support models with models that prioritize user functional and technical requirements (Abdelhakim & Shirmohammadi 2008; Terawaki 2009). Still others view LMS as standardized products with similar generic tools such as quizzes/tests and communication and collaboration spaces, and emphasize implementation success case studies from peer organizations as the primary decision‐making drivers (Black et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%