The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2021.1928673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving daily stochastic streamflow prediction: comparison of novel hybrid data-mining algorithms

Abstract: In the current paper, the efficiency of three new standalone data-mining algorithms [M5 Prime (M5P), Random Forest (RF), M5Rule (M5R)] and six novel hybrid algorithms of bagging (BA-M5P, BA-RF and BA-M5R) and Attribute Selected Classifier (ASC-M5P, ASC-RF and ASC-M5R) for streamflow prediction were assessed and compared with an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model as a benchmark. The models used precipitation (P) and streamflow (Q) data from the period 1979-2012 for training and validation (7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, daytime precipitation data from 2000 to 2020 were used to simulate daytime river flows from 2000 to 2020 and predict the streamflow before one day and six days. In general, the model training process using the machine learning approach encounters several difficulties because the raw streamflow data has nonlinear characteristics, which strongly influence the model if we directly use these data in the model (Khosravi et al, 2021). It is, therefore, necessary to normalize these data.…”
Section: Study Area and Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, daytime precipitation data from 2000 to 2020 were used to simulate daytime river flows from 2000 to 2020 and predict the streamflow before one day and six days. In general, the model training process using the machine learning approach encounters several difficulties because the raw streamflow data has nonlinear characteristics, which strongly influence the model if we directly use these data in the model (Khosravi et al, 2021). It is, therefore, necessary to normalize these data.…”
Section: Study Area and Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can generate predictions through the evaluation and simulation of the hydrological cycle. The use of physical parameters allows us to comprehend the different hydrological processes with relatively high spatial and temporal resolution (Lane et al, 2019;Khosravi et al, 2021). Although considerable effort has been made to improve the precision of physics-based models, they have been restricted by uncertainties in datasets, parameter heterogeneity, and non-linearities in generating streamflow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature broadly consists of two sets of streamflow prediction models: physics-based and data-based. Physics-based models are developed only using real-life streamflow data (Khosravi et al, 2021;Rahimzad et al, 2021). Although this method has been proven effective in predicting the streamflow of rivers around the world, the development of such models is very complicated and timeconsuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this method has been proven effective in predicting the streamflow of rivers around the world, the development of such models is very complicated and timeconsuming. In addition, physical-based models require detailed data like topography, precipitation, and land use/land cover to calibrate model parameters, and these models can also be negatively affected when watershed data do not respond well to water balance constraints (Khosravi et al, 2021). The uncertainty of precipitation and hydrology data also greatly influences streamflow prediction, and physics-based models suffer in data-limited regions (Krzysztofowicz, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in forecasting TRW, ARIMA uses just the time lags of TRW itself and does not need other hydro-meteorological variables, such as air temperature, flow discharge, etc. The ARIMA model is widely used in the prediction of time series data: discharge patterns [45][46][47][48][49][50][51], river water characteristics [52][53][54], and water consumption [55,56]. However, in the literature, there are few studies that use Box-Jenkins stochastic models for forecasting TRW time series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%