2015
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2014.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving credit scoring by differentiating defaulter behaviour

Abstract: We present a methodology for improving credit scoring models by distinguishing two forms of rational behaviour of loan defaulters. It is common knowledge among practitioners that there are two types of defaulters, those who do not pay because of cash flow problems ('Can't Pay'), and those that do not pay because of lack of willingness to pay ('Won't Pay'). This work proposes to differentiate them using a game theory model that describes their behaviour. This separation of behaviours is represented by a set of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, it is still possible to reason about the good/bad dichotomy, simply by considering the predictions Pr(Y = 0|X = x). This suggestion, to split the "bads" into subclasses, is familiar in credit scoring where different types of bad debt are considered, such as the "can't pay" and "won't pay" behavioural distinction [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, it is still possible to reason about the good/bad dichotomy, simply by considering the predictions Pr(Y = 0|X = x). This suggestion, to split the "bads" into subclasses, is familiar in credit scoring where different types of bad debt are considered, such as the "can't pay" and "won't pay" behavioural distinction [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, alternative data variables are strong indicators of both the willingness and capacity to repay a loan (Bravo, Thomas, & Weber, 2015). However, the types and varieties of these indicators (almost 20 new variables had significant effects upon the estimation) result in significant gains in both financial and statistical terms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the exact reasons for retail credit defaults are innumerable (e.g., job loss, marital breakdown, financial naivety, fraud), they are crudely grouped into either fraud ('won't pay') or financial distress ('can't pay'), as explored in Thomas (2009, pp. 282) and Bravo, Thomas and Weber (2015). Modelling the exact reason and its underlying causes is challenging in practice since lenders rarely keep record of defaulting reasons.…”
Section: A Defining Background On Loan Defaultmentioning
confidence: 99%