Improving Credibility by Delegating Judicial Competence - The Case of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may

Does being a foreigner shape judicial behaviour? Evidence from the Constitutional Court of Andorra, 1993–2016

“… 17 On judicial reputation, see generally Garoupa and Ginsburg (2015). Voigt et al (2007) make the same argument concerning the British Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. …”

Independent electoral management bodies and international election observer missions: any impact on the observed level of democracy? A conceptual framework

“…Nevertheless, an erudition of domestic sovereignty can be observed as international election observation has become an ever bigger ''business'' since the end of the cold war as democracy has spread around the world, starting with the invitation of international observers of the Noriega government of Nicaragua in 1989. 62 International monitoring sits at the intersection of the ''right'' of the people to democratic governance on the one hand and sovereignty rights of states on the other 61 See, e.g., (Voigt et al 2007) on the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. 62 (Pastor 1999b, p. 125) classifies Nicaragua as the first observer mission similar to those conducted now.…”

Mapping Constitutionally Safeguarded Judicial Independence—A Global Survey

“…For countries that did so, constitutionally guaranteeing judicial independence might thus not have appeared as an important issue (on the relevance of this court for the economic development of former colonies, see Voigt et al. ). However, note that the statistically significant result in Table does not depend on the outlying patterns in the Caribbean.…”