2018
DOI: 10.1108/jsm-07-2017-0257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving consumers’ willingness to pay using social media activities

Abstract: Purpose This study examines the impact of social media activities on consumers’ willingness to pay a premium price (WTPp) in the banking industry, and investigates the role of consumer-brand identification (CBI) on this relationship. For the first time, the effect of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) is considered separately from other social media marketing efforts (SMME). Design/methodology/approach Data from a sample of 145 banking customers that follow bank social networks was analysed using structural equ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to organizational identification theory, consumers with high brand identification are more likely to return a favor to the brand and engage in various supportive behaviors than consumers with low brand identification (Mael and Ashforth 1992 ; Yoshida 2017 ). From the consumer’s perspective, such behaviors include repeat purchase, positive word-of-mouth, resistance to brand switching, and willing to pay a price premium (Ahearne et al 2005 ; Haumann et al 2014 ; Lam et al 2010 ; Torres et al 2018 ). Also, from the consumer-company identification framework (Bhattacharya and Sen 2003 ), highly identified consumers will exhibit effort-intensive behaviors (e.g., brand loyalty, brand promotion, customer recruitment, and resilience to negative information) in order to enhance their favorite brand’s long-term welfare.…”
Section: Theoretical Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to organizational identification theory, consumers with high brand identification are more likely to return a favor to the brand and engage in various supportive behaviors than consumers with low brand identification (Mael and Ashforth 1992 ; Yoshida 2017 ). From the consumer’s perspective, such behaviors include repeat purchase, positive word-of-mouth, resistance to brand switching, and willing to pay a price premium (Ahearne et al 2005 ; Haumann et al 2014 ; Lam et al 2010 ; Torres et al 2018 ). Also, from the consumer-company identification framework (Bhattacharya and Sen 2003 ), highly identified consumers will exhibit effort-intensive behaviors (e.g., brand loyalty, brand promotion, customer recruitment, and resilience to negative information) in order to enhance their favorite brand’s long-term welfare.…”
Section: Theoretical Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to enhance the generalizability of its results, this paper uses actual customers from diff erent age groups who are active on Facebook pages and use the services provided by hotels. One recent study encouraged further examination into service industries, such as those in tourism (Torres et al, 2018). Th is study was among the fi rst to focus on SMMA in the service industry of hospitality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research offers a lot of ideas on how these variables should be managed to influence important brand outcomes such as engagement, customer-company identification, purchases and brand loyalty. For instance, research on authenticity states that it is an important ingredient in consumer-brand relationships and leads to important outcomes such as purchases and brand loyalty (Osei-Frimpong et al , 2019; Torres et al , 2018). The authenticity of influencers can be increased by presenting both positive and negative aspects about a product (Doh and Hwang, 2009) and by increasing self-disclosure in online communications (Collins and Miller, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%