2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00723.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving compatibility between blood packs and transfusion sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Difficulties arising from the poor compatibility of some blood bag and transfusion set combinations and their associated safety implications have been described previously (Nightingale, 2006). They remain a significant and ongoing patient safety issue (Clarke, 2007; Clarke et al , 2007). Proposed changes to international standards for blood bags (BS EN ISO 3826‐1, 2003) and transfusion sets (BS EN ISO 1135‐4, 2004) summarized in Table 1 provide a potential resolution when adopted by manufacturers.…”
Section: Proposed Amendments To the Design Requirements Of Internatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficulties arising from the poor compatibility of some blood bag and transfusion set combinations and their associated safety implications have been described previously (Nightingale, 2006). They remain a significant and ongoing patient safety issue (Clarke, 2007; Clarke et al , 2007). Proposed changes to international standards for blood bags (BS EN ISO 3826‐1, 2003) and transfusion sets (BS EN ISO 1135‐4, 2004) summarized in Table 1 provide a potential resolution when adopted by manufacturers.…”
Section: Proposed Amendments To the Design Requirements Of Internatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b ) and the force required to overcome that barrier is negligible. The issue of poor compatibility of blood bags and transfusion devices has previously been raised, mostly regarding the force that is needed for insertion and the stability of the connection [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Clarke (Clarke, 2007), it should be noted that the Letter was authored by both Dr G. Clarke and Dr J. Hannon and not by Dr G. Clarke alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%