2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses

Abstract: Hinrichs for useful feedback and Aaron Anthony for exceptional research assistance. All errors are our own. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
121
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(96 reference statements)
2
121
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the college degree attainment gap increased when one considers family income. Specifically, researchers have reported that 74% of students from high‐income families earn a bachelor’s degree compared with only 41% of students from low‐income families (Page & Scott‐Clayton, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the college degree attainment gap increased when one considers family income. Specifically, researchers have reported that 74% of students from high‐income families earn a bachelor’s degree compared with only 41% of students from low‐income families (Page & Scott‐Clayton, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Page and Scott‐Clayton () and French and Oreopoulos () for comprehensive summaries of the recent research on nudges toward and through college.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these needs in mind, researchers point out several strategies that may help meet the needs of incoming community college students, many of whom are marginalized or underrepresented and underprepared. They include: partnering for transfer with local universities fostering community service partnerships offering first‐year programming providing clear orientation and admission communication offering career purpose advising and planning assigning the best teachers to classes taken early in a student's career placing additional emphasis on developmental education effectiveness providing services for nonacademic challenges (Goldrick‐Rab, ; Page & Scott‐Clayton, ; Romano, ) …”
Section: Practical Implications Of a Nationwide Programmentioning
confidence: 99%