2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.scient.2012.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving change detection methods of SAR images using fractals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many types of artificial neural networks in AI and the mainstream network structures used for change detection are described above. In addition, other networks, such as Hopfield networks [47,48,65,[205][206][207], back propagation networks [42,149,208,209], multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) [70,[210][211][212][213][214], extreme learning machines [215], and self-organizing map (SOM) networks [55,[216][217][218][219][220][221], do not require a large number of training samples to learn high-level abstract features as deep neural networks do, but due to their shallow network structure, low sample size requirements, and easy training process, they are also widely used in change detection tasks and can achieve satisfactory results. Since they can be regarded as traditional machine learning techniques, we will not make more detailed comments here due to space limitations and existing reviews [7,222,223].…”
Section: Other Artificial Neural Network and Ai Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many types of artificial neural networks in AI and the mainstream network structures used for change detection are described above. In addition, other networks, such as Hopfield networks [47,48,65,[205][206][207], back propagation networks [42,149,208,209], multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) [70,[210][211][212][213][214], extreme learning machines [215], and self-organizing map (SOM) networks [55,[216][217][218][219][220][221], do not require a large number of training samples to learn high-level abstract features as deep neural networks do, but due to their shallow network structure, low sample size requirements, and easy training process, they are also widely used in change detection tasks and can achieve satisfactory results. Since they can be regarded as traditional machine learning techniques, we will not make more detailed comments here due to space limitations and existing reviews [7,222,223].…”
Section: Other Artificial Neural Network and Ai Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the fusion data from multi-period data, the two most common approaches are using change analysis methods and direct concatenation. Change analysis methods, such as CVA [47], differencing by log-ratio operator [18,148] or change measures [103,149], are able to directly provide change intensity information (i.e., the difference data) in multitemporal data, which can highlight change information and facilitate change detection. The direct concatenation method can retain all the information of the multi-period data, so the change information is extracted by the subsequent classifier.…”
Section: Direct Classification Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of such an operator to suppress speckle noise is limited because it ignores the spatial information. Aghababaee, Amini, and Tzeng (2013) improved the change detection method using the new measures containing a grey level gradient or intensity information and the fractal dimension. Although many features including texture features and spatial information can be used as input of traditional algebraic operation change detection algorithm, the detection accuracy is not high because of the influence of speckle noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, there have been a number of researches for PolSAR data classification. Different classifiers such as MLP Neural Networks (Haddadi et al, 2011;Salehi et al, 2014), SVM (Aghababaee, Amini, & Tzeng, 2013;Bai et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2010;Maghsoudi et al, 2012), Fuzzy Inference systems (FIS) (Hellmann & Jäger, 2002), Decision Tree (Qi, Yeh, Li, & Lin, 2012), Random Forest (Du, Samat, Waske, Lie, & Li, 2015), Wishart (Lee, Grunes, & Kwok, 1994) and maximum likelihood (ML) (Lee & Pottier, 2001) have been used as classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%