Improving Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With a CPR Feedback Device and Refresher Simulations (CPR CARES Study)

Cheng, Adam; Brown, Linda; Duff, Jonathan P.; Davidson, Jennifer; Overly, Frank; Tofil, Nancy M.; Peterson, Dawn Taylor; White, Marjorie Lee; Bhanji, Farhan; Bank, Ilana; Gottesman, Ronald; Adler, Mark; Zhong, John; Grant, Vincent; Grant, David J.W.; Sudikoff, Stephanie N.; Marohn, Kimberly; Charnovich, Alex; Hunt, Elizabeth A.; Kessler, David; Wong, Hubert; Robertson, Nicola J.; Lin, Yiqun; Doan, Quynh; Duval-Arnould, Jordan; Nadkarni, Vinay

doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2616

Cited by 193 publications

(138 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

122

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Many studies indicated rapid skill deterioration after CPR training, but little is known about the optimal interval and contents for CPR retraining. 1 Our data are consistent with those of previous studies suggesting the effectiveness of low-dose retraining 11,18,19 and include information about the optimum interval and methods for CPR retraining.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…1 This is a critical issue because most of the general public rarely encounter a real cardiac arrest. Although frequent training can be one solution to maintain CPR skills, [9][10][11] evidence to recommend the optimal interval for CPR retraining is insufficient. 1 Various methods of retraining, such as voice advisory feedback, self-learning video instructed courses, selfassessment feedback and tests, and mobile phonebased reminders have been attempted.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effectiveness of a One‐minute Self‐retraining for Chest Compression‐only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Controlled Trial

Nishiyama

Shimamoto

Kiyohara

et al. 2017

AEM Education and Training

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Although cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills decay after training, little is known about appropriate retraining methods. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a 1-minute self-retraining (with automated assessment and feedback) at 3 months after the initial 45-minute chest compression-only CPR training in a simulated randomized controlled trial.Methods: After the initial 45-minute chest compression-only CPR training, participants were randomly assigned to either a 1-minute self-retraining group or a control group. Three months after the initial training, the selfretraining group individually attended the 1-minute self-retraining with a self-training device. The participants' resuscitation skills were evaluated by a 2-minute case-based scenario test 6 months after the initial training. The primary outcome was the number of correct chest compressions with appropriate depth.Results: A total of 109 subjects participated in this study. With regard to the primary outcome, the number of chest compressions performed at the appropriate depth, there was not a statistically significant difference between groups (136. Conclusions: The 1-minute self-retraining program with hands-on practice appears to help preserve certain chest compression skills. Further efforts to provide methods to maintain CPR skills should be considered.A lthough early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and shocks by bystanders are the keys to increase survival after sudden cardiac arrests, 1 the proportions of bystander CPR and automated external

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of a One‐minute Self‐retraining for Chest Compression‐only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Controlled Trial

Nishiyama

Shimamoto

Kiyohara

et al. 2017

AEM Education and Training

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…49 Greater attention to promoting realism of the simulation scenario with respect to timing, duration, and integration of tasks with accompanying feedback creates a learning environment best suited to improving learning outcomes. 50 To quote the legendary coach Vince Lombardi, "Practice doesn't make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect.…”

Section: Educational Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Learners who used devices that provided corrective feedback during CPR training had improved compression rate, depth, and recoil compared with learners performing CPR without feedback devices. 50, Evidence on the effect of feedback devices on CPR skill retention is limited, with 1 of 3 studies demonstrating improved retention. 82,85,86 Use of feedback devices can be effective in improving CPR performance during training (Class IIa, LOE A).…”

Section: Cpr Feedback/prompt Devices In Training Eit 648 -New and Updmentioning

confidence: 99%

Part 14: Education

Bhanji¹,

Donoghue²,

Wolff³

et al. 2015

Circulation

Self Cite

232

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Es wurden jedoch substanzielle Abweichungen in der Verbesserung der CPR-Leistung zwischen verschiedenen CPR-Feedback-Geräten entdeckt [74][75][76].…”

Section: Trainingsstrategien Für Die Basismaßnahmenunclassified