2002
DOI: 10.1051/agro:2002008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving canopy variables estimation from remote sensing data by exploiting ancillary information. Case study on sugar beet canopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 20% of LUT entries with the best radiometric match (i.e., the smallest J(r) values) are considered possible solutions and subjected to minimization in the variable space (Section 2.3.3). The 20% threshold is consistent with what other authors proposed in earlier studies [37,49].…”
Section: Exploiting Radiometric Informationsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 20% of LUT entries with the best radiometric match (i.e., the smallest J(r) values) are considered possible solutions and subjected to minimization in the variable space (Section 2.3.3). The 20% threshold is consistent with what other authors proposed in earlier studies [37,49].…”
Section: Exploiting Radiometric Informationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Instead we explore radiometric information and information on the variables in two successive steps ( Figure 1). The successive exploration of radiometric and a priori information has been successfully implemented by other authors too [37,49].…”
Section: Lookup Table Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a series of Gaussian white noise, from 0-20% with a step 1%, was added to LUT simulate canopy reflectance to account for uncertainties attached to the models and measurements [55,56,73,77]. Second, multiple best solutions were used instead of a single best solution to calculate the estimated values [55,56,73,78]. Several studies have demonstrated that the single best parameter combination corresponding to the smallest distance calculated by a cost function (e.g., RMSE) does not necessarily lead to the best accuracies [43,78].…”
Section: Cost Function Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, multiple best solutions were used instead of a single best solution to calculate the estimated values [55,56,73,78]. Several studies have demonstrated that the single best parameter combination corresponding to the smallest distance calculated by a cost function (e.g., RMSE) does not necessarily lead to the best accuracies [43,78]. Different optimization numbers and the mutual effect on these regularization options have been systematically assessed in previous studies [55,56].…”
Section: Cost Function Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inversion approach is promising because it is based on physical models [1,4,7]. Unfortunately, the ill-posed inversion problem [10] is prevalent in the model-based retrieval procedure and results in uncertainty in the retrieved LAI. The use of a priori information has been demonstrated to alleviate the ill-posed inversion problem [1,6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%