2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving BCI performance by task-related trial pruning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, there exist a certain number of users who cannot generate discriminative task-related brain signals in every trial. Recently, Sannelli, Braun, and Müller (2009) developed a method to prune such undesirable trials by comparing true labels and their predictions. They computed CSP only with reliable trials, which can improve BCI classification performance and stabilize the features at the same time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, there exist a certain number of users who cannot generate discriminative task-related brain signals in every trial. Recently, Sannelli, Braun, and Müller (2009) developed a method to prune such undesirable trials by comparing true labels and their predictions. They computed CSP only with reliable trials, which can improve BCI classification performance and stabilize the features at the same time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods robustify the variance estimation in CSP by applying L p -norms (Wang et al, 2012b;Park and Chung, 2013). The authors of (Sannelli et al, 2009) apply trial pruning in order to separate signal from noise and (Parra et al, 2005) discuss several methods for minimum noise estimation. A beta divergence method for robust spatial filtering is proposed in this thesis and has been prepublished in (Samek et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Robust Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizan como espacio de características los valores de ERD/ERS y MRP recogidos en cada uno de los ensayos realizados por diversos sujetos en lugar del promediado de ambas características para todos los ensayos. Es por tanto destacable que, en aquellos estudios en los que trabaja con datos experimentales, para mejorar la relación señalruido (Sannelli et al, 2009), se realiza un promediado de las características de la señal EEG sobre varios ensayos de diferentes sujetos. De este modo, obvian la variabilidad propia de cada sujeto en cuanto a los valores subjetivos de esas características y a las ventanas temporales en las que se producen, dando lugar a ICCs con baja precisión.…”
Section: Identificación Del Movimiento Voluntariounclassified