2009 Fifth International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet Based Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1109/sitis.2009.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Bag of Visual Words Image Retrieval: A Fuzzy Weighting Scheme for Efficient Indexation

Abstract: Recent works on Content Based Image Retrieval rely on bag of visual words to index visual content. Analogically to the bag of words approach in text retrieval, this model of description represents an image as a vector of weights, where each weight corresponds to the importance of a visual word in the image, and is computed according to the chosen weighting scheme. Instead of using the known weighting schemes directly migrated from text retrieval domain, we propose a new approach specifically for images. The pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, five existing image retrieval systems are selected for the comparison purpose namely Vector of Local Aggregated Descriptor (VLAD) for image retrieval [50], Fisher Vector (FV)-based approach [51], Fuzzy Bag-of-Visual-Words model (Fuzzy-BoVW) [61], weighted bag-of-visual-words model [62] and the direct use of local features for retrieval (SIFT) [63]. Table 5 shows the MAP values and the average F 1 scores of various aggregation-based image signatures for the retrieval operation.…”
Section: Retrieval Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, five existing image retrieval systems are selected for the comparison purpose namely Vector of Local Aggregated Descriptor (VLAD) for image retrieval [50], Fisher Vector (FV)-based approach [51], Fuzzy Bag-of-Visual-Words model (Fuzzy-BoVW) [61], weighted bag-of-visual-words model [62] and the direct use of local features for retrieval (SIFT) [63]. Table 5 shows the MAP values and the average F 1 scores of various aggregation-based image signatures for the retrieval operation.…”
Section: Retrieval Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahmed et al [72] 93.0 BoVW [71] 78.5 txx [73] 61.5 fuzzy weights [74] 80.0 vwa [75] 86.0 BoCIDVW [71] 95.4 NE-C (ours)…”
Section: Proposed Descriptors Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each segment is described by a histogram, where the k bins are the visual words and the corresponding values are the weights of the words in the image region. To compute the weight of a visual word of a given region, we apply the fuzzy weighting scheme proposed in [22] and defined by the equation:…”
Section: Creating Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%