2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87991-6_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Automatic UML2 Profile Generation for MDA Industrial Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For future works, we plan to apply the quality model into different MDD approaches by using an integration process that automatically generates metamodeling extensions [55][56][57]. By using the integration proposal, we plan to show how the proposed quality model allows the automatic verification of the list of defect types found in MDD proposals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For future works, we plan to apply the quality model into different MDD approaches by using an integration process that automatically generates metamodeling extensions [55][56][57]. By using the integration proposal, we plan to show how the proposed quality model allows the automatic verification of the list of defect types found in MDD proposals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision to use EMOF (instead of complete MOF) is due to the closeness that exists between EMOF metamodeling capabilities and UML profile extension capabilities. This facilitates the generation of UML profile extensions to integrate the particular metamodeling information of a source EMOF metamodel into a target EMOF metamodel [14].…”
Section: Integration Metamodelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the solution defined in [14] to automatically generate metamodel extensions for the integration of two modeling languages. This is an EMOF-based metamodel that is generated from the metamodel of the source modeling language, and its definition includes the mapping information to identify the equivalences between the source and target modeling languages.…”
Section: Step 2 Definition Of the Integration Metamodel The Integramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach requires the manual definition of an initial UML profile skeleton, which is typically a tedious and error-prone task [23]. The methodology introduced in [7,8] facilitates the derivation of a UML profile using a DSML as input. The methodology requires the manual definition of an intermediate metamodel that captures the abstract syntax.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology requires the manual definition of an intermediate metamodel that captures the abstract syntax. Despite the potential of these approaches, they usually involve non-trivial human-driven tasks, e.g., a UML profile skeleton [15] or an intermediate metamodel [7,8]. In contrast, our approach builds on top of standard Ecore metamodels (which are usually available in MBSE).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%