Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1774088.1774453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving automatic music genre classification with hybrid content-based feature vectors

Abstract: Current research on the task of automatic music genre classification has been focusing on new classification approaches based on combining information from other sources than the music signal. The reason for this is that the use of contentbased approaches, i.e. using features extracted directly from the audio signal, seems to have reached a glass ceiling. In this work we show that by using different types of contentbased features together it is possible to substantially improve the classification accuracy. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We see that the most common experimental design to test MGR systems is Classify. More than 91% (397) 2 of the referenced work having an experimental component (435) uses such a design [1-9, 11- 21, 26-43, 45,47-50,52-56,58-60,62-65,68-70,72-76,79-83,86-90,92-99,102-106,108-122, 124-135, 137-148, 150, 151, 153-165, 167-172, 174-180, 182-197, 199-202, 204- [271] test a neural network trained to discriminate between classical and pop music. They extract features from the audio, input them to the neural network, and compare the output labels against those they assigned to the excerpts of their dataset.…”
Section: Evaluation Approaches In Music Genre Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see that the most common experimental design to test MGR systems is Classify. More than 91% (397) 2 of the referenced work having an experimental component (435) uses such a design [1-9, 11- 21, 26-43, 45,47-50,52-56,58-60,62-65,68-70,72-76,79-83,86-90,92-99,102-106,108-122, 124-135, 137-148, 150, 151, 153-165, 167-172, 174-180, 182-197, 199-202, 204- [271] test a neural network trained to discriminate between classical and pop music. They extract features from the audio, input them to the neural network, and compare the output labels against those they assigned to the excerpts of their dataset.…”
Section: Evaluation Approaches In Music Genre Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also plan to extend this study to investigate the use of content-based symbolic features for hierarchical music genre classification [28]. Another interesting research direction is to compare the performance of the early fusion method used in this work with the late fusion employed by several authors in previous studies [11], [14], [25], [29]. We would like to thank the authors of [25] for kindly sharing the information about the song artist and song title used in their three-fold cross-validation experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the few exceptions is the work of [14], where the authors combine different types of content-based audio features. The combination of different types of audio features improved the music genre classification accuracy [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Costa et al further improved upon their method in [8], where LBP features were combined with Mel Scale Zoning (MSZ) technique [9] to obtain better classification on the LMD database using the SVM classifier. Gradually, music genre classification moved in the direction of hybrid content based classifiers with Rhythm Histograms (RH), InsetOnset Interval Histogram Coefficients (IOIHC) and Statistical Spectrum Descriptors (SSD) being used in [10] along with MARSYAS features. Upon application of SVM for classification, the hybrid classifiers outperformed the methods involving single feature sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%