2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving automated multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation with a cascaded 3D convolutional neural network approach

Abstract: In this paper, we present a novel automated method for White Matter (WM) lesion segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patient images. Our approach is based on a cascade of two 3D patch-wise convolutional neural networks (CNN). The first network is trained to be more sensitive revealing possible candidate lesion voxels while the second network is trained to reduce the number of misclassified voxels coming from the first network. This cascaded CNN architecture tends to learn well from small sets of training da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
281
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
281
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to DSC which weighs recall and precision equally, and the ROC analysis, we consider the area under the PR curves (APR, shown in Figure 2) the most reliable performance metric for such highly skewed data [8,1]. To put the work in context, we reported average DSC, F 2 , and APR scores (equal to 56.4, 57.3, and 56.0, respectively), which indicate that our approach performed very well compared to the latest results in MS lesion segmentation [6,20]. We did not conduct a direct comparison in the application domain, however, as this paper intended to provide proof-of-concept on the effect and usefulness of the Tverky loss layer (and F β scores) in deep learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to DSC which weighs recall and precision equally, and the ROC analysis, we consider the area under the PR curves (APR, shown in Figure 2) the most reliable performance metric for such highly skewed data [8,1]. To put the work in context, we reported average DSC, F 2 , and APR scores (equal to 56.4, 57.3, and 56.0, respectively), which indicate that our approach performed very well compared to the latest results in MS lesion segmentation [6,20]. We did not conduct a direct comparison in the application domain, however, as this paper intended to provide proof-of-concept on the effect and usefulness of the Tverky loss layer (and F β scores) in deep learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We tested our FCN with Tversky loss layer to segment multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions [6,20]. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR MRI of 15 subjects were used as input, where we used two-fold cross-validation for training and testing.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations