The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2014
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2014.6926300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving attitudes towards social robots using imagined contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, results of the influence of the imagined scenario on the trusting behavior seem to infirm our hypothesis that imagining a collaborative interaction scenario would determine a higher level of trust, While this in contrast with the findings in the study of Kuchenbrandt et al (2012) witnessing that robots acceptance increases when users imagine a collaborative scenario, this is line with the more recent study of Wullenkord et al (2014), where participants who had imagined contact with a robot did not report more positive attitudes towards robots. However, in the specific case of our study, the weak influence of the imagined scenario on the participants' level of trust can be explained by the fact that the participants had difficulties in imagining the proposed interaction scenario.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, results of the influence of the imagined scenario on the trusting behavior seem to infirm our hypothesis that imagining a collaborative interaction scenario would determine a higher level of trust, While this in contrast with the findings in the study of Kuchenbrandt et al (2012) witnessing that robots acceptance increases when users imagine a collaborative scenario, this is line with the more recent study of Wullenkord et al (2014), where participants who had imagined contact with a robot did not report more positive attitudes towards robots. However, in the specific case of our study, the weak influence of the imagined scenario on the participants' level of trust can be explained by the fact that the participants had difficulties in imagining the proposed interaction scenario.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Conversely, in a subsequent study Wullenkord et al . (2014) reproduced a similar scenario but obtained different results: participants who had imagined contact with a robot did not report more positive attitudes towards robots nor they showed higher contact intentions with it than participants who had imagined contact with a human or with other kinds of technical devices.…”
Section: Type Of Hri Scenariomentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Previous research by Wullenkord and Eyssel [20] has shown that the amount of detail in an imagination scenario did not influence the effects of IC on robot attitudes. In their study, the authors used a restaurant scenario that was described either with a low versus high amount of detail.…”
Section: (C) Independent Variable: Imagined Contactmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Only few previous studies have tested IC in the context of social robots with regards to attitudes and the respective findings presented a rather mixed picture (e.g. [19][20][21]): for example, Kuchenbrandt and Eyssel have demonstrated that independent of content of the imagination, IC with a robot improved robot-related attitudes [19]. In turn, results by Wullenkord and Eyssel [20] have shown that IC with a robot did not change robot-related attitudes significantly.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation