2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07983-7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Arabic Texts Morphological Disambiguation Using a Possibilistic Classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, this paper is an extended version of our work in [27]. This new contribution stands out by the following aspects.…”
Section: Proposals and Outlinementioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, this paper is an extended version of our work in [27]. This new contribution stands out by the following aspects.…”
Section: Proposals and Outlinementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, we run 10 iterations where 90% of the words are used for training and 10% for testing. To get the disambiguation rates of each feature, we perform as follows: (a) we analyze the vocalized texts and we save the correct morphological solutions; (b) we remove the short vowels of the same texts; (c) we disambiguate the obtained texts with our classifier and we store the results; finally (d) we compare the two results [27]. The morphological feature of a non-vocalized word is correct when its classification result corresponds to the result given to its associated vocalized word.…”
Section: Experimentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stem indexes reduce ambiguity (Ayed, 2014;Bounhas et al, 2015), but it will from the other side, reduce recall, since some studies (Al-Kabi et al, 2011) showed that in most cases, morphological variants of words have somehow similar semantic interpretations and are not completely dissimilar and different word forms may bear similar meaning. When we apply a light stemming to the same example, "alinkissamat-‫"االنقسامات‬ (the divisions) and "inkissam-‫"انقسام‬ (division) will have the same stem but their semantic relation with "kisma ‫"قسمة-‬ (division) will be ignored.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33] , [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [18], [48], [49], [50] 31(29%) Stemming and Lemmatization [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [4], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61] 12(11%) Information Retrieval [9], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], …”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%