2016
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0397oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Appropriate Neurologic Prognostication after Cardiac Arrest. A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: A multicenter quality intervention improved rates of appropriate neurologic prognostication after OHCA but did not increase survival with good neurologic outcome. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01472458).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this trial did not show significant improvement in survival, it does provide support for the feasibility of successful implementation of a standardized protocol. 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this trial did not show significant improvement in survival, it does provide support for the feasibility of successful implementation of a standardized protocol. 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Additionally, the guideline recommendations were preceded by a local step-wedged randomized trial that evaluated a knowledge translation strategy to increase TTM among receiving hospitals starting in 2008. 17 During our study period, the use and successful implementation of TTM increased. After completion of the RCT in 2010, most receiving hospitals in our catchment area continued to participate in the Strategies for Post-Arrest Resuscitation Care (SPARC) network, where the goal was to standardize, monitor, and improve post-arrest care and encourage best practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Survival with good neurological outcome was collected after 2010, and defined as survival to hospital discharge with a Modified Rankin Score (MRS) ≤ 2. 17…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All 24 studies followed the before/after scheme and 5 have a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) design. [8][9][10]22 While 9 studies involved different medical departments, 6,[10][11][12]17,19,21,22,27 15 of them concerned only Emergency departments and/or paramedics. Most of articles proposed a multimodal approach: only 7 of them concerned exclusively A&F. [7][8][9][10][11]13,22 As it's shown in Table 2, 9 articles talked about measurements for infective pathologies (especially antibiotic stewardship), 7,8,12,13,16,17,21,22,29 6 of them treated cardiac arrest or cardiovascular emergency problems, 8,19,20,[25][26][27] 2 of them treated stroke, 15,24 3 ones were about laboratory analyses 10,18,28 and 4 of them treated any other fields (diabetic ketoacidosis, use of a prothrombin complex, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%