2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2014.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving an outpatient clinic utilization using decision analysis-based patient scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, predictors identi ed as non-signi cant in our work displayed similar behavior in previous studies; more speci cally, gender [2,27]; schooling [28]; cancer [15]; day [2,16,23,25]; shift of the appointment [14,16]; age [2,11]; and number of consultations scheduled in previous year [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, predictors identi ed as non-signi cant in our work displayed similar behavior in previous studies; more speci cally, gender [2,27]; schooling [28]; cancer [15]; day [2,16,23,25]; shift of the appointment [14,16]; age [2,11]; and number of consultations scheduled in previous year [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In our model, there are two possible explanations for this variable's behavior: rst, most appointments made for the year 2017 (58%) are for patients from other cities for which free transportation is provided by their municipalities; second, patients lack other options of specialized radiology services in their hometowns. Other studies also positively related the no-show probability with the lead time between scheduling a medical appointment and getting it [2,7,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior work has shown that factors can include gender, age [40,41], social factors [42], patient perceptions of medical providers, direct patient costs, distance to the clinic, a lack of a personal relationship with the physicians [6], adherence to physician visits [43], the perception of long waiting times [44], the delay in scheduling appointments [45], the long lead time from scheduling Research Article date to appointment date [46], and the provider's specialty [6]. Others estimated the no-show rate based on factors, such as purpose of visit, day of the week, and age using data mining techniques [47,48] or logistic regression modeling [49,50] and developed a predictive model for the probability of no-shows for groups of patients that shared common attributes, often in an attempt to minimize costs rather than predicting errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help alleviate negative effects from these factors, a number of methods have been used to determine possible solutions, such as Monte Carlo simulation [3], stochastic modeling [4,5], dynamic/deterministic optimization models [6,7], and testing different scenarios for a clinical setting through simulation [8,9]. Solutions that have been studied to improve outpatient delivery systems include scheduling of resources [10,11], studying forecasting models [12], evaluating patients before visits [13], the best sequence for scheduling patients [14], predicting patient show or no-show [15], and adjusting appointment times [16]. One of the solutions that is studied by many researchers is redesigning patient appointment templates, also known as appointment rules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%