2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40292-017-0221-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Adherence to Treatment and Reducing Economic Costs of Hypertension: The Role of Olmesartan-Based Treatment

Abstract: Poor adherence to antihypertensive treatment is the single most important factor of unsatisfactory blood pressure (BP) control. This review focuses on therapy-related factors affecting adherence and suggests how to improve it with a wise choice of treatment schedule. Complex drug treatment schemes, poor tolerability and drug substitutions are frequent causes of poor adherence which, in turn, causes insufficient BP control, greater incidence of cardiovascular events and, finally, higher global health costs. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study in Canada also showed yearly medicine cost savings with FDCs [169], and a study in Japan also showed significant medicine cost savings with FDCs versus patients taking multiple tablets [170]. Other published studies involving high-income countries have also shown significantly lower costs for FDCs in CVD versus multiple tablets [45,[171][172][173][174]. However, Deshmukh et al (2017) in the US found the acquisition costs for FDCs were higher among patients being treated for their hypertension versus free-pill combinations although the higher costs were more than offset by lower inpatient costs [43].…”
Section: Cardiovascular Diseases (Cvd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study in Canada also showed yearly medicine cost savings with FDCs [169], and a study in Japan also showed significant medicine cost savings with FDCs versus patients taking multiple tablets [170]. Other published studies involving high-income countries have also shown significantly lower costs for FDCs in CVD versus multiple tablets [45,[171][172][173][174]. However, Deshmukh et al (2017) in the US found the acquisition costs for FDCs were higher among patients being treated for their hypertension versus free-pill combinations although the higher costs were more than offset by lower inpatient costs [43].…”
Section: Cardiovascular Diseases (Cvd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of fixed-dose combination therapies represents a very attractive strategy for improving BP control and represents today one of the key elements for a successful large-scale hypertension program with the aim of obtaining BP control in the large majority of hypertensive patients, as well as higher levels of adherence and persistence of the treatment [53]. In this view, a platform approach has been proposed to help physicians in making the most appropriate choice, with therapies founded on single-pill fixed dose combination of two or three drugs, on the basis of grade of hypertension, concomitant risk factors and organ damage and comorbidities [54,55].…”
Section: Therapeutic Strategies For Early Bp Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La adherencia al tratamiento ha sido identificada como uno de los factores más importantes para conseguir valores de presión arterial (PA) adecuados en pacientes hipertensos (1) . La adherencia sub-óptima (3) (el paciente sigue una pauta o dosis inferior a la recomendada por el médico), está asociada a una mayor incidencia de eventos cardiovasculares y, finalmente, mayores costos al sistema de salud (4)(5)(6) .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified