2017
DOI: 10.1080/10528008.2017.1323554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving AACSB Assurance of Learning with Importance-Performance and Learning Growth: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is useful in providing information about how subjects and programs improve using feedback from quality assurance exercises as one source of evaluation information. One other approach is to tier the skills in learning outcomes instead of treating them equally (Harvey & McCrohan, 2017). Whilst the present study has this as limitation, it nonetheless offers readers the nature of priority areas in learning and teaching that need emphasis as seen by academics, the changes academics perceived as effective to target these areas and the important contribution of assurance of learning exercises to inform and improve curricula; and ultimately student learning experience.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This is useful in providing information about how subjects and programs improve using feedback from quality assurance exercises as one source of evaluation information. One other approach is to tier the skills in learning outcomes instead of treating them equally (Harvey & McCrohan, 2017). Whilst the present study has this as limitation, it nonetheless offers readers the nature of priority areas in learning and teaching that need emphasis as seen by academics, the changes academics perceived as effective to target these areas and the important contribution of assurance of learning exercises to inform and improve curricula; and ultimately student learning experience.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our biggest takeaway is that when doing learning assurance, you may find that underlying mental models held by students, rather than faulty assessment design or lack of faculty follow through and action, may be the culprit. While the literature indicates reasons or challenges in closing the loop (Harvey & McCrohan, 2017), we have identified three main reasons that are germane to our specific professional dress assessment and why we could not close the loop. These items will be discussed in the next sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, although the engaged learning methods we discuss are not new, the increased emphasis by AACSB should influence marketing pedagogy. For example, these guidelines focus on learning outcomes for courses that are mission-driven, with an emphasis on what is learned and on closing the loop to improve course pedagogy (Harvey & McCrohan, 2017;Payne et al, 2008). AACSB prioritizes engaged learning as one of its accreditation standards and suggests that business students should actively participate in the learning process (AACSB, 2003).…”
Section: Aacsb Standards Of Engaged Learning and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%