Improvements to Lawn and Garden Equipment Emissions Estimates for Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

Lawn and garden equipment are a significant source of emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants in suburban and urban areas. Emission estimates for this source category are typically prepared using default equipment populations and activity data contained in emissions models such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) NONROAD model or the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) OFFROAD model. Although such default data may represent national or state averages, these data are unlikely to reflect regional or local differences in equipment usage patterns because of variations in climate, lot sizes, and other variables. To assess potential errors in lawn and garden equipment emission estimates produced by the NONROAD model and to demonstrate methods that can be used by local planning agencies to improve those emission estimates, this study used bottom-up data collection techniques in the Baltimore metropolitan area to develop local equipment population, activity, and temporal data for lawn and garden equipment in the area. Results of this study show that emission estimates of VOCs, particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) for the Baltimore area that are based on local data collected through surveys of residential and commercial lawn and garden equipment users are 24-56% lower than estimates produced using NONROAD default data, largely because of a difference in equipment populations for high-usage commercial applications. Survey-derived emission estimates of PM and VOCs are 24 and 26% lower than NONROAD default estimates, respectively, whereas survey-derived emission estimates for CO, CO2, and NO(x) are more than 40% lower than NONROAD default estimates. In addition, study results show that the temporal allocation factors applied to residential lawn and garden equipment in the NONROAD model underestimated weekend activity levels by 30% compared with survey-derived temporal profiles.

Toward quantification and source sector identification of fossil fuel CO2 emissions from an urban area: Results from the INFLUX experiment

“…There is some evidence that off‐road vehicle (including construction vehicles, farm vehicles, and snowmobiles) CO emissions may also be substantially overestimated in the USEPA NEI [ Frey et al ., ; Reid et al ., ], but no improved estimates are available. Therefore, we make a simple assumption that the USEPA NEI2011 overestimates both on‐road and off‐road mobile emissions by the same factor, and scale the USEPA NEI2011 off‐road mobile CO emissions down to 9000–18,000 tCO yr −1 .…”

The domestic garden – Its contribution to urban green infrastructure

“…weekly during optimum growth). Although accurate estimations of carbon use through mowing are difficult to attain (Reid et al, 2010), Jo and McPherson (1995) suggest petrol-powered mowing releases 1.5-fold the carbon sequestered by the lawn itself. Two stroke engines particularly are considered detrimental with a 7-fold higher by-product emission compared to four stoke engines (Volckens et al, 2008).…”

Factors Influencing Home Lawn Fertilizer Choice in the United States

“…However, residential fertilizer use throughout the United States is beginning to be scrutinized due to potential environmental impacts from excessive use of micro-and macronutrients. For example, improper fertilization practices have been connected to nonpoint source water pollution, which can lead to algal blooms and depleted oxygen levels in waterways (Carrico et al, 2013;Cook et al, 2012;Martini et al, 2015;Reid et al, 2010;Robbins and Birkenholtz, 2003;Robbins and Sharp, 2003). This has led to increased scrutiny from state and local regulators who have implemented restrictions and fertilizer bans to reduce potential pollution issues (Miller, 2012;Wallace et al, 2016).…”