1992
DOI: 10.1109/20.123861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements of convergence characteristics of Newton-Raphson method for nonlinear magnetic field analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nakata et al [5] studied the divergence of the Newton-Raphson method in magnetic field analysis. They developed a method that determines the optimum relaxation factor, which uses the residual of Galerkin method.…”
Section: Methods 1: Optimum Relaxation Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nakata et al [5] studied the divergence of the Newton-Raphson method in magnetic field analysis. They developed a method that determines the optimum relaxation factor, which uses the residual of Galerkin method.…”
Section: Methods 1: Optimum Relaxation Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bastos et al [10] proposed a local relaxation factor which was applied to individual nodes, however the high computation time is the main disadvantage of this method. Nakata et al [5] developed a method that finds an optimum relaxation factor by using interpolation functions. Functional and L 2 norms are also alternative techniques that have been used in developing relaxation factors, where good results were reported by Fujiwara et al [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second term represents the work done by the exciting currents imposed to the system. By Manuscript discretizing the problem and interpolating the solution over all elements, (3) transforms into (4) with being the vector of unknown nodal or edge values of the vector potential, is the magnetic energy density J/m , and is the source vector (A) [1]. For magnetic systems with nonhysteretic ferromagnetic materials, is a nonlinear function of .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, 2-D calculations may be applied [3] to these heads. We have examined the field distribution of these heads using 2-D and 3-D [4] calculations. Taking advantage of their symmetrical structures, the problems were halved and then divided into 3-D meshes by an automatic mesh-generating pre-processor [5]: for the MIG head, 335,566 tetrahedra and 57,523 nodes; for the thin-film head, 241,603 tetrahedra and 42,303 nodes.…”
Section: Iintroduc~onmentioning
confidence: 99%