1939
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1939.tb00451.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements in the accuracy of insulin assay on white mice. I1

Abstract: According to previous publications from this laboratory ( H e mm i n g s e n , 1933, p. 198 and 208; H e m m i n g s e n and Weitze, 1936, p. 628), the accuracy to be obtained in single insulin assays involving abt. 100-160 mice with a body weight dispersion of 4 g, corresponded to a standard deviation varying from abt. I 2 to abt. 25 p. c. of the average.Unsuccessful attemps at improving the accuracy of the convulsive dose method have been published for tiny fishes ( H e m m i n gs e n and B r u u n , 1938) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to immunological assay, the stock extracts were diluted 500-fold with the glycine albumin buffer. The biological activity of these extracts was also determined by the mouse convulsion assay (19 protein. The latter was eventually discarded when it proved too soluble in sodium sulfite at the pH of 8.5 used for the assay.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to immunological assay, the stock extracts were diluted 500-fold with the glycine albumin buffer. The biological activity of these extracts was also determined by the mouse convulsion assay (19 protein. The latter was eventually discarded when it proved too soluble in sodium sulfite at the pH of 8.5 used for the assay.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, this was the first point at which the technique was formalized using the inverse probability function (and the normal distribution.) [In Bliss (1934b), the author notes that two other researchers, Hemmingsen (1933) and Gaddum (1933) had used essentially the same method in a study of toxicity in mice. ]…”
Section: Figure 3 Percentage Errors In Pearson Table Of Probability Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%