2013
DOI: 10.3997/1365-2397.2013028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements in magnetic depth estimation: application of depth and width extent nomographs to standard depth estimation techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former assumption may have limited applicability in relation to deeper basement sources as may be judged from the example cross-sectional model of Figure 2b. Flanagan and Bain (2013) also note depth errors as high as 40% when the assumption of infinite depth extent is made. When considering assessments of mid-to deep-crustal sources, the practical depth extent of potential sources is also restricted by the (assumed) limit of 30 km.…”
Section: Processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The former assumption may have limited applicability in relation to deeper basement sources as may be judged from the example cross-sectional model of Figure 2b. Flanagan and Bain (2013) also note depth errors as high as 40% when the assumption of infinite depth extent is made. When considering assessments of mid-to deep-crustal sources, the practical depth extent of potential sources is also restricted by the (assumed) limit of 30 km.…”
Section: Processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Many methods of estimating the depth to basement from magnetic data rely on the simple assumption that the geometry of the causative source has an infinite depth extent (Flanagan and Bain, 2013). This assumption ignores the fact that the thickness of the magnetized layer will be depth limited by either the crust-mantle interface (the Moho) or the Curie temperature of the magnetic minerals, whichever depth is shallower (Wasilewski et al, 1979;Wasilewski and Mayhew, 1992;Lee et al, 2010;Salem et al, 2010;Flanagan and Bain, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption ignores the fact that the thickness of the magnetized layer will be depth limited by either the crust-mantle interface (the Moho) or the Curie temperature of the magnetic minerals, whichever depth is shallower (Wasilewski et al, 1979;Wasilewski and Mayhew, 1992;Lee et al, 2010;Salem et al, 2010;Flanagan and Bain, 2013). Within continental areas, the Moho and Curie isotherm are likely to be at great depth and hence the effect on depth-to-source estimates is small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation