“…Therefore, we conjecture that, surface SiO2 layer did not largely close over the active sites of Pt-Pd/CZA catalyst because the SiO2 layer was porous, and hence catalytic activity of the SiO2/ Pt-Pd/CZA would not obviously be worse than that of the Pt-Pd/CZA catalyst, meanwhile this deduction is consistent with the activity and TPR test results. In addition, SiO2 layer is uniformly covered on the surface of the catalyst, as shown in Section 3.2.3, SiO2 is non-sulfating support which shows excellent sulfur resistance performance, 23,36,37 thus, we infer that sulfur resistance performance of SiO2/Pt-Pd/CZA catalyst would be improved by the surface coating of porous SiO2, which is confirmed by the sulfation test results.…”