Improvements in Implant Dentistry over the Last Decade: Comparison of Survival and Complication Rates in Older and Newer Publications

Pjetursson, Bjarni E.; Asgeirsson, Asgeir G; Zwahlen, Marcel; Sailer, Irena

doi:10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2

Cited by 275 publications

(293 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

262

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite the high survival rates and predictability of rehabilitating patients with single-tooth restorations using dental implants, prosthetic complications (abutment screw loosening/fracture, chipping/fracture of veneering materials, need for recementation) still remain an issue; managing these complications can cause extra amount of chair-side time, additional costs and patient dissatisfaction [2,[5][6][7][8][9][10]. Abutment screw loosening was described already in 1996 as the most common complication affecting abutments tightened with a titanium screw [15].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although abutment screw loosening may not lead to implant failure, it represents a problem, because it takes time to remove the crown and screw it again; moreover, where frequent, screw loosening may adversely affect the patient's satisfaction with the implant treatment [5,6,12,13]. Now-a-days, in fact, patients have high functional and esthetic expectations in relation to dental therapies [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Now-a-days, in fact, patients have high functional and esthetic expectations in relation to dental therapies [5]. Since patient satisfaction is a key, it is therefore very important to minimize the incidence of complications [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Clinical Evaluation of 762 Single-Tooth, Locking-Taper Implants: A Prospective Study with 1- to 12-Years of Follow-Up

Riaud¹

2016

Journal of Dentistry and Oral Care Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical Evaluation of 762 Single-Tooth, Locking-Taper Implants: A Prospective Study with 1- to 12-Years of Follow-Up

Riaud¹

2016

Journal of Dentistry and Oral Care Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Su principal ventaja son los altos valores de resistencia a la fractura y por lo tanto son considerados la regla de oro o "gold estándar" en este tipo de aditamentos protésicos (Pjetursson et al, 2007;Sailer et al, 2007). Sin embargo estos pilares le confieren un aspecto de coloración grisácea a la mucosa comprometiendo la estética en la rehabilitación sobre implantes (Berglundh et al, 2002;Simonis et al, 20120;Gomes & Montero, 2011;Pjetursson et al, 2014;Jung et al, 2012;Charyeva et al, 2012). Para mejorar las características estéticas de los pilares se han desarrollado otras alternativas como los pilares de alúmina altamente sinterizada.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Evaluación In vitro de la Resistencia a la Fractura de los Pilares Individualizados en Disilicato de Litio

Pérez

Bravo

Salazar

et al. 2016

Int. J. Odontostomat.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Odontostomat., 10(2):185-195, 2016. RESUMEN:Los pilares híbridos individualizados en disilicato de litio, permiten adaptarse a la forma y el perfil de emergencia obtenido después de la temporalización de los implantes, presentando buenas características ópticas y determinando la posibilidad de una cementación adhesiva. El propósito del estudio fue evaluar la resistencia a la fractura de pilares individualizados en disilicato de litio en comparación con los pilares en circona-ytria tetragonal (Y-TZP), ambos cementados en una base de titanio PGTB (Ti base) mediante un estudio experimental in vitro. Se confeccionaron 10 pilares: 5 como grupo control, elaborados en Y-TZP, mediante el sistema Ceramill multi-X Amanngirrbach ® y 5 pilares híbridos en disilicato de litio mediante la técnica de inyección (IPS e.max ® press abutment solution, Ivoclar Vivadent) como grupo experimental. Cada pilar se precargó a un implante con un torque de 30 N/cm 2 . Todas las coronas se fabricaron en disilicato de litio (técnica monolítica) y se cementaron usando cemento resinoso de curado dual (RelyX ® U200, 3M ESPE). La medición de la resistencia a la fractura se realizó en una maquina universal de pruebas (instron ® ), modelo 2519-105. La resistencia a la fractura fue almacenada y evaluada utilizando la prueba paramétrica t-student. Para evaluar las fracturas incipientes y clasificar el tipo de falla se usó un microscopio óptico Carl Zeiss. los valores de resistencia promedio para los pilares de disilicato de litio fueron de 655,5 N y para los de circona 780,52 N con una desviación estándar de 145,76 N y 147,71 N, respectivamente. Ambos tipos de pilares evidenciaron buen comportamiento ante la prueba de resistencia a la fractura; sin embargo, se requieren más estudios que evalúen este tipo de pilares.PALABRAS CLAVE: cerámicas, porcelana dental, disilicato de litio, pilar híbrido, resistencia a la fractura.

show abstract

“…Pjetursson and colleagues, by comparing survival and complications rates from studies published before and after the year 2000 (from 1994 to 2012), concluded that dentistry shows a continuous positive learning curve in dental implants: the 5-year survival rate of implant-supported prostheses significantly increased in newer studies (97.1%) compared with older studies (93.5%) [2]. On the contrary, there was a significant increase in the number of technical complications for the overall results.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Technique to Improve an Ailing Interim Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Denture

2015

J Oral Biol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Implant-supported interim prostheses aims to preserve the natural periodontal architecture, protect the surrounding tissues, and provide patients with immediate esthetic and functional outcomes. The objective of this clinical technique article is to present a reliable method to replace an ailing interim implant-supported fixed partial denture (FPD). Clinical considerations:Patient presented with an ailing interim implant-supported fixed partial denture (FPD) replacing all lower anterior incisors. After case was clinically and radiographically evaluated, diagnostic casts were mounted. Once the interim FPD was retrieved, provisional abutments were dislodged and cleaned. Implant impression copings were carried out intraorally using pattern resin; its respective implant replicas were attached and screwed. Healing abutments were hand-screwed to keep the periimplant tissue architecture until the delivering of the newly fabricated interim FPD. The implant impression copings and its respective implant replicas were positioned on the diagnostic cast using dental stone. The two provisional abutments were positioned on the implant replicas and screwed in place for the relining of the new interim prosthesis previously made with acrylic resin. The new interim FPD was finished, polished and delivered. Conclusion:This clinical technique presents a reliable method for fabricating an immediate interim implant-supported FPD to replace an existing ailing interim prosthesis.assess proposed occlusal schemes before definitive restoration is placed [9].Provisional restorations designs appertain to implant therapy range from the removable acrylic resin complete denture to implantsupported fixed prosthesis [4][5][6][7][8]10,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20].The multiple clinical challenges (e.g. complex biomechanics, time management and periimplant tissue' architecture), dictates the type of material required. Generally, the aforementioned techniques are modeled by anecdotal and observational information, and are conveyed from natural tooth provisional techniques.Contemporary materials for interim prostheses include polymethyl methacrylate (PMM), polyethyl methacrylate, polyvinyl ethyl methacrylate, bis-acryl composite resin, and visible lightpolymerized urethane dimethacrylate [21]. Besides its inherent exothermic reaction [9,[22][23][24] and volumetric shrinkage [23,[25][26][27], PMM have shown-among the literature-better physical properties [9,[27][28][29][30], color stability [27,31], and durability [9,27,32]. The present technique utilizes an indirect approach, were its fabrication takes place on the laboratory. The indirect technique eliminates the problems associated with the direct technique such as less accuracy on the margins, more chemical and thermal irritants around the tissues and more chances to locked the interim prostheses due to surrounding undercuts [28,29].By utilizing the indirect technique with PMM in implant dentistry, our expected clinical outcomes have more chances to be colored by the "tincture of...

show abstract

Improvements in Implant Dentistry over the Last Decade: Comparison of Survival and Complication Rates in Older and Newer Publications

Cited by 275 publications

References 82 publications

Clinical Evaluation of 762 Single-Tooth, Locking-Taper Implants: A Prospective Study with 1- to 12-Years of Follow-Up

Clinical Evaluation of 762 Single-Tooth, Locking-Taper Implants: A Prospective Study with 1- to 12-Years of Follow-Up

Evaluación In vitro de la Resistencia a la Fractura de los Pilares Individualizados en Disilicato de Litio

A Technique to Improve an Ailing Interim Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Denture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About