2010
DOI: 10.4238/vol9-4gmr951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvements in cytological preparations for fluorescent in situ hybridization in Passiflora

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Cytological preparations for the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique require cytoplasm-free metaphases, with well-spread chromosomes, for the localization of DNA sequences and chromosome mapping. We tested various procedures for FISH analysis of Passiflora cacaoensis, P. gardneri and hybrid F 1 progeny of P. gardneri x P. gibertii. Two treatments with four enzymes and three incubation times were compared. The material was treated with 1.0 M HCl before enzymatic digestion. The following… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GISH technique followed the protocol proposed by Schwarzacher & Haslop‐Harrison (2000) and Souza et al . (2010), with modifications by Melo et al . (2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GISH technique followed the protocol proposed by Schwarzacher & Haslop‐Harrison (2000) and Souza et al . (2010), with modifications by Melo et al . (2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slide preparation followed the protocol proposed by Schwarzacher & Heslop-Harrison (2000), modified by Souza et al (2010). Slides containing the cytological preparations were oven-dried at 37 °C for a minimum time of 1 h. After application of 50 μL RNase (1 μg/mL) (Sigma ®) in 2× SSC buffer (0.3 M sodium chloride, Sigma®, 0.03 M sodium citrate, Sigma®), slides were incubated in a humid chamber for 1 h at 37 °C.…”
Section: Slide Preparation For Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytogenetic information has allowed comparison between taxa and the identification of inter-and intraspecific chromosomal variations (Souza et al, 2010;Melo et al, 2011;Guerra, 2013;Melo et al, 2014;Melo et al, 2015;Coelho et al, 2016;Melo et al, 2017). More detailed information on chromosome structure has been developed in recent studies demonstrating the potential of cytogenetic analysis between taxa for comparisons of genetic and cytogenetic maps among different species and genera (Snowdon et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GISH application followed the protocols for in situ hybridization that were proposed by Schwarzacher and Haslop-Harrison (2000) and Souza et al (2010) with adaptations. Slides containing the cytological preparations were oven-dried at 37°C for at least 1 h and were then subjected to treatment with 100 μg/mL RNase (Sigma, United States, R5125) in 2X SSC buffer [0.3 M sodium chloride (Sigma, United States, S3014) and 0.03 M sodium citrate (Sigma, United States, S5941)]; the slides were then incubated in a humid chamber for 1 h at 37°C.…”
Section: Gishmentioning
confidence: 99%