2019
DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v41i1.42708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of the specific detection of <i>Xanthomonas phaseoli</i> pv. <i>manihotis</i> based on the <i>pthB</i> gene

Abstract: Modifications were made in the PCR conditions aiming to overcome the problem of non-amplification of the Xanthomonas phaseoli pv. manihotis (Xpm) fragment, using the primer pair XV / XK described in the literature. The objective of this study was to propose changes in the primers already described (XV / XK_MOD) and validate the use of these new primers in identifying Xpm. The validation procedure was carried out with the primer pair XV and XK_MOD, using different strains of Xpm, other plant pathogenic and endo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three PCR-based methods were reported for Xpm detection recently. The first method used an optimized version of a previous assay (Verdier et al, 1998) resulting in improved Xpm detection (Cerqueira-Melo et al, 2019). The second approach was based on a multiplexed nested PCR including a broadly conserved fragment of Xpm transcription activator-like (TAL) effector genes and a semispecific region of rpoB, resulting in a wider detection potential for Xpm strains (Bernal-Galeano et al, 2018).…”
Section: Diagnostic Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three PCR-based methods were reported for Xpm detection recently. The first method used an optimized version of a previous assay (Verdier et al, 1998) resulting in improved Xpm detection (Cerqueira-Melo et al, 2019). The second approach was based on a multiplexed nested PCR including a broadly conserved fragment of Xpm transcription activator-like (TAL) effector genes and a semispecific region of rpoB, resulting in a wider detection potential for Xpm strains (Bernal-Galeano et al, 2018).…”
Section: Diagnostic Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were kept at 4°C for use in the polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). The molecular characterization of the bacterial isolates was conducted via amplification with specific primers for pathogenic Xpm isolates (Verdier et al, 1998;Melo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR was performed using the following final concentrations: 3.0 μL denatured DNA at 95°C, 1X Taq buffer, 2.5 mmol L -1 MgCl 2 , 0.2 mmol L -1 dNTPs, 0.4 μmol L -1 primers XV (5'-TTC-GGC-AAC-GGC-AGT-GAC-CAC-C-3'), and XK_MOD (3'-AAT-CGG-AGA-TTA-CCT-GAG-CG-5') specific for Xpm (Verdier et al, 1998;Melo et al, 2019), with a final volume adjusted to 15 μL. The programming conditions were: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 36 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 95°C, primer annealing at 60 o C for 30 s, and extension at 72 o C for 1 min, ending with a 7 min cycle at 72°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%