2022
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2235/1/012089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of the model by preprocessing big data of tapping temperature prediction industry

Abstract: The quality of steel is highly related to the tapping temperature. At present, many models can predict the tapping temperature to a certain extent. However, after in-depth exploration of the model, it was found that most of the models have a better performance for the tapping temperature prediction of common steel, while the special steel was ignored. It is because that most models are rough in the data processing. The neglect of incomplete data, uneven distribution problems have caused models to over-emphasiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also worth noting that the average performance of zero-filling-coupled network is higher than mean-value-filling-coupled network. One possible explanation is that zero-filling method can mask missing values by 0, whereas mean-filling method introduces more inaccurate information to the network [51] . To gain a more intuitive understanding of the impacts of missing-value imputation methods on neoantigen prediction performance, we randomly removed 42.5 % of values from the test dataset according to the rate of missing value in the training dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth noting that the average performance of zero-filling-coupled network is higher than mean-value-filling-coupled network. One possible explanation is that zero-filling method can mask missing values by 0, whereas mean-filling method introduces more inaccurate information to the network [51] . To gain a more intuitive understanding of the impacts of missing-value imputation methods on neoantigen prediction performance, we randomly removed 42.5 % of values from the test dataset according to the rate of missing value in the training dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%