2003
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.52.1.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of the Mitochondrial Antioxidant Defense Status Prevents Cytokine-Induced Nuclear Factor-κB Activation in Insulin-Producing Cells

Abstract: Proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1␤ [IL-1␤], tumor necrosis factor-␣ [TNF-␣], and ␥-interferon [IFN-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(62 reference statements)
5
98
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This led us to speculate that HIIT-related improvements to lipid markers may have partially explained the non-significant differences in post-intervention SBP in HIIT (227.12 mmHg), compared to SED (239.77 mmHg, +5.28% v. HIIT) and LIT (241.63 mmHg, +6.01% v. HIIT). In the present study, significant HIITrelated increases in the mRNA expression of Sod1 (compared to SED) and Cat (compared to SED and LIT) may further explain the non-significant differences in post-intervention SBP in HIIT, via eAO-mediated increases in molecular-level protection [10,35]. Research indicates that radical-mediated damage is a primary contributor to the development of hypertension [36] as superoxide can stimulate NFκB transcription factors that eventually lead to endothelial dysfunction and reduced vasodilation, resulting in increased peripheral resistance and elevated blood pressure [37].…”
Section: Ckd) Is Timelymentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This led us to speculate that HIIT-related improvements to lipid markers may have partially explained the non-significant differences in post-intervention SBP in HIIT (227.12 mmHg), compared to SED (239.77 mmHg, +5.28% v. HIIT) and LIT (241.63 mmHg, +6.01% v. HIIT). In the present study, significant HIITrelated increases in the mRNA expression of Sod1 (compared to SED) and Cat (compared to SED and LIT) may further explain the non-significant differences in post-intervention SBP in HIIT, via eAO-mediated increases in molecular-level protection [10,35]. Research indicates that radical-mediated damage is a primary contributor to the development of hypertension [36] as superoxide can stimulate NFκB transcription factors that eventually lead to endothelial dysfunction and reduced vasodilation, resulting in increased peripheral resistance and elevated blood pressure [37].…”
Section: Ckd) Is Timelymentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Regulating NFκB-mediated INF is one beneficial effect of endogenous antioxidant enzymes (eAO). Specifically, superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and catalase (CAT) quench radicals while simultaneously inhibiting nuclear translocation of NFκB [10], thereby reducing systemic INF and INF-related radical generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation of the transcription factor NF-κB has a pro-apoptotic role in beta cells exposed either to IL-1β + IFN-γ [58,59] or to dsRNA + IFN-γ [22]. MnSOD and IκBα are two genes that might participate in beta-cell defence against apoptosis by decreasing NF-κB activation [60,61], and both mRNAs were induced by dsRNA. MnSOD is a NF-κB dependent [52] mitochondrial antioxidant enzyme, and overexpression of MnSOD protects beta cells against immune-mediated damage [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the importance of maintaining normal redox potential in beta cells, it is not surprising that experimental overexpression of free radical dissipating enzymes such as catalase, glutathione peroxidase and the cytoplasmic copper-zinc superoxide dismutase protects cultured rodent beta cells from deleterious combinations of cytokines (interferon gamma [IFN-γ], tumor necrosis factor α [TNF-α] and interleukin 1 [IL-1]) [13]. However, it is unusual to find a mouse with systemically upregulated antioxidant defences that include increased expression at the beta cell level as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%