2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4968011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of optical and electric characteristics of MoO3/Ag film/MoO3 flexible transparent electrode with metallic grid

Abstract: In this paper, the authors report rationally designed, innovative tri-layer flexible transparent conductive electrodes (TCEs) fabricated via thermal deposition. The proposed structure improves transparency compared with that of the traditional tri-layer electrode (dielectric/metal film/dielectric) by using metallic grid patterns (dielectric/metal grids/dielectric). The obtained MoO3/Ag grids/MoO3 TCEs show low sheet resistance and good mechanical properties. The sheet resistance of the proposed electrodes is 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming the formation of identical Ag films based on similar sheet resistances, the lower APT of MoO 3 -based T-OSCs can be attributed to the higher light absorption of MoO 3 itself. Generally, the LUE (LUE; PCE × APT) is used to fairly compare various types of T-OSCs because of the trade-off relationship between the PCE and APT. , The LUE values of the devices, WO 3 -based T-OSCs and MoO 3 -based T-OSCs, are 3.27 and 2.86%, respectively, as shown in Table , denoting that WO 3 -based T-OSCs are better T-OSCs than MoO 3 -based T-OSCs. Referring to the APT-dependent LUE of the full device configuration, our work recorded the highest LUE (3.27%) and notable transparency (46.7%) of the device.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the formation of identical Ag films based on similar sheet resistances, the lower APT of MoO 3 -based T-OSCs can be attributed to the higher light absorption of MoO 3 itself. Generally, the LUE (LUE; PCE × APT) is used to fairly compare various types of T-OSCs because of the trade-off relationship between the PCE and APT. , The LUE values of the devices, WO 3 -based T-OSCs and MoO 3 -based T-OSCs, are 3.27 and 2.86%, respectively, as shown in Table , denoting that WO 3 -based T-OSCs are better T-OSCs than MoO 3 -based T-OSCs. Referring to the APT-dependent LUE of the full device configuration, our work recorded the highest LUE (3.27%) and notable transparency (46.7%) of the device.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 shows the surface energy and polarity of MoO 3 with the UV-ozone, PA solution treatments, and without any treatments. The surface energy was calculated by the equations shown below: 31,32 γ L (1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%