Improvement of neutron startup source handling work by developing new transportation container for high-temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR)

Shimazaki, Yasuhisa; Sawahata, Hiroaki; Shinohara, Masanori; Yanagida, Yoshinori; Kawamoto, Taiki; Shoji, T.

doi:10.1080/00223131.2016.1255574

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, the intensity of the sources noticeably influences the LOFC transient behavior [39]. HTTR contains three 3.7 GBq Cf-252 neutrons sources, which have a 2.645-year half-life and thus need replaced every 7 years [35].…”

Section: Neutron Sourcementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

FY22 Status Report on the ART-GCR CMVB and CNWG International Collaborations

Labouré

Lindell

Ortensi

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work presents the numerical model for the high temperature test reactor (HTTR) loss of forced cooling (LOFC) experiment with the INL codes Griffin, BISON, and RELAP-7, based on the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework. Promising results were obtained, with the overall behavior of the reactor successfully captured. Changes in the heat transfer coupling, as compared to the fiscal year (FY)-21 model, enabled drastic improvement of the steady-state solution, both in terms of computational time and global energy discrepancies. The former was reduced by a factor of roughly 60, whereas the latter decreased from 11% to less than 2%. Furthermore, the discrepancy in the steady-state multiplication factor was improved from +2,300 and +2,900 pcm (for the 30 and 9 MW cases) to -700 and +1,200 pcm, respectively, and now falls well within the large measurement uncertainties stemming from graphite impurities. Validation of the Monte Carlo model used to generate cross sections was also performed against available measurements. Though significant, the discrepancies remain acceptable overall in light of the large uncertainty.Numerous improvements are still needed to better compare with the experiment involving the 9 MW case and to instill greater confidence in the model's ability to accurately predict the 30 MW behavior. Specifically, the power levels predicted by the 9 MW transient simulation following re-criticality remain low, pointing to an underestimation of the passive cooling of the core. A key aspect of future work will be to better understand the flow pattern during the LOFC event, particularly to determine if natural or forced convection is occurring inside the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). More generally, additional validation data would be immensely useful for further enhancing the numerical model and better matching the experiments. In addition, a more sophisticated thermal-hydraulics model that simulates all the channels as a single system model should be considered to take into account the rest of the primary loop. Finally, even if the results are iv in better agreement with the experiments, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification will be necessary to evaluate the model uncertainty. v

show abstract

Section: Neutron Sourcementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The last replacement before the 9 MW test seems 3 to have been conducted in 2006 [35], whereas the transient was performed in December 2010. The most recent replacement of the neutron source was conducted from July 6 to October 20, 2015 [16], with the actual experiment initially scheduled for early 2022.…”

Section: Neutron Sourcementioning

confidence: 99%