2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of maneuverability in a VLCC by a high lift rudder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even unstable ships should have a more or less symmetrical response to the same input signal, i.e., the rudder angle. Although in general the oscillation periods of ship heading of Zigzag with smaller rudder angle are longer, the sea trial test data of this benchmark ship has shown a much longer period of Zigzag with rudder angle of 10 • than that of 20 • when comparing it with the results from literature (Aoki et al, 2006;Kijima and Nakiri, 2002;Liu, 2017;Yasukawa and Yoshimura, 2015;Zaky et al, 2018).…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, even unstable ships should have a more or less symmetrical response to the same input signal, i.e., the rudder angle. Although in general the oscillation periods of ship heading of Zigzag with smaller rudder angle are longer, the sea trial test data of this benchmark ship has shown a much longer period of Zigzag with rudder angle of 10 • than that of 20 • when comparing it with the results from literature (Aoki et al, 2006;Kijima and Nakiri, 2002;Liu, 2017;Yasukawa and Yoshimura, 2015;Zaky et al, 2018).…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Once a decision is made on an appropriate avoidance maneuver (maintaining existing operations may also be an active decision; see section Discussion), the rapidity by which the new operational state is achieved can vary dramatically among ship types (e.g., bulk carriers vs. tankers vs. passenger vessels) and within similar-type ships based on technical features such as hull shape and maneuvering systems (e.g., Yasukawa et al, 2018;Zaky et al, 2018). Further, variation can occur based upon environmental conditions (e.g., Yasukawa et al, 2012;Rameesha and Krishnankutty, 2019) and/or the existing operational state of the ship (wave height, wind, ship's existing speed, acceleration/deceleration, whether or not the ship is already engaged in a turn, etc.…”
Section: Ship Maneuverability During Active Whale Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested that the big advantage of such a bionic rudder was mainly manifested in the post-stall regime, and the maximum lift coefficient of this bionic rudder was nearly 9.4% higher than that of conventional rudders at Re = 8 × 10 5 . Zaky et al [20] discussed the effect of bionic rudders with a fishtail section on maneuverability. The results indicate that the bionic rudder with a fishtail section increases the effective rudder force by approximately 10%, and improves the maneuverability of the Very Large Crude Oil Carrier with a 30% reduction in Energy Efficiency Design Index compared to a conventional rudder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%