2018
DOI: 10.4103/ejim.ejim_8_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of iron-deficiency anemia resulting from gastric antral vascular ectasia in patients with systemic sclerosis: cyclophosphamide versus argon plasma coagulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of GAVE treatment, SSc patients in our cohort were treated in accordance with expert recommendations [ 28 ] including PPI and / or H2RA therapy (95.8% and 33.8% respectively), with endoscopic treatment and surgery being reserved for those with refractory severe GAVE (with laser therapy being performed on just over a quarter of patients (25.5%) in our cohort) [ 28 ]. Despite small studies and case series showing a therapeutic effect of cyclophosphamide on GAVE when used for other indications such as ILD or progressive skin disease, our data did not show a benefit with immunosuppressive therapy including cyclophosphamide [ 29 , 30 ]. However, this study did not specifically address the exact indication for cyclophosphamide; its therapeutic duration and /or therapeutic response so we cannot draw any conclusions as to the benefit of cyclophosphamide therapy in management of SSc GAVE.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…In terms of GAVE treatment, SSc patients in our cohort were treated in accordance with expert recommendations [ 28 ] including PPI and / or H2RA therapy (95.8% and 33.8% respectively), with endoscopic treatment and surgery being reserved for those with refractory severe GAVE (with laser therapy being performed on just over a quarter of patients (25.5%) in our cohort) [ 28 ]. Despite small studies and case series showing a therapeutic effect of cyclophosphamide on GAVE when used for other indications such as ILD or progressive skin disease, our data did not show a benefit with immunosuppressive therapy including cyclophosphamide [ 29 , 30 ]. However, this study did not specifically address the exact indication for cyclophosphamide; its therapeutic duration and /or therapeutic response so we cannot draw any conclusions as to the benefit of cyclophosphamide therapy in management of SSc GAVE.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%