2018
DOI: 10.1541/ieejeiss.138.641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of Input Time for Communication Aid on ALS Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(eq.6) ITR in our method was 22 bits/min ( = 2, = 94%, = 1.7 sec). For example, Kitamura's [8] research on the P300 speller for ALS patients showed BCI of 12 bits/min ( = 60, = 81%, = 21 sec). In addition, Geng's [9] motor imagery BCI was 16 bits/min ( = 4, = 68%, = 2 sec).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(eq.6) ITR in our method was 22 bits/min ( = 2, = 94%, = 1.7 sec). For example, Kitamura's [8] research on the P300 speller for ALS patients showed BCI of 12 bits/min ( = 60, = 81%, = 21 sec). In addition, Geng's [9] motor imagery BCI was 16 bits/min ( = 4, = 68%, = 2 sec).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system has the potential to reduce the input time compared with the traditional switch systems, e.g., mouse click. Kitamura et al improved the input time for ALS patients by using Brain Computer Interface (BCI) [2]. The BCI is a lower physical stress method than eye-tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%