2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2018.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of human–machine compatibility of upper-limb rehabilitation exoskeleton using passive joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a description of the human anatomy and clinical applications, the basic movement of the human arm is abduction/adduction ( α ) around the sagittal axis ( y ), flexion/extension ( β ) around the coronal axis ( x ), and internal/external ( γ ) around the vertical axis ( z ), which is based on the anatomical description method [ 45 ]. The elevation plane ( η ), the elevation angle ( θ ), and the internal/external rotation angle ( ψ ) are the basic variables of the ISB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a description of the human anatomy and clinical applications, the basic movement of the human arm is abduction/adduction ( α ) around the sagittal axis ( y ), flexion/extension ( β ) around the coronal axis ( x ), and internal/external ( γ ) around the vertical axis ( z ), which is based on the anatomical description method [ 45 ]. The elevation plane ( η ), the elevation angle ( θ ), and the internal/external rotation angle ( ψ ) are the basic variables of the ISB.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some devices even enhance lower extremity performance [12][13][14][15] to provide better mobility to patients with knee injuries or other kinds of loss of function in the lower extremities. For the arms, many types of assistive exoskeleton device have been described [16][17][18][19][20][21], and most devices can be combined with other adapted equipment. However, only a few assistive exoskeleton rehabilitation devices for the hand have been described, mostly due to the complexity in the structure of the hand and the large range of motion that the fingers, making design for a hand assistive device very difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of evaluating the task-space operation capability of industrial robots working with an end-effector, different performance indices, including the dexterity measure, minimum singular value and manipulability ellipsoid, are usually utilized, and these indices can all be defined based on the Jacobian matrices mapping the velocity and force from a robotic joint (actuator) space to the Cartesian (end-effector) space. [20][21][22] However, unlike end-effector manipulation robots, the task space of a wearable exoskeleton corresponds to the joint space of the human body, and the velocity and force must be transferred from the active joint space of the exoskeleton to the wearer's joint space. Consequently, it is more reasonable to define the evaluation indices on the basis of matrices which reflect the velocity and force mapping relationships between the two joint spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%