2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74773-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of glucose metabolism in pregnant women through probiotic supplementation depends on gestational diabetes status: meta-analysis

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on glucose metabolism in pregnant women using data from randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, this meta-analysis examines whether the observed effects depend on the presence or absence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and if the effect is dependent on the type of supplement used (probiotic or synbiotic). We performed a literature search of databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean treatment duration was approximately 9 weeks, ranging from 3 weeks of duration [ 67 ] to 26 weeks [ 56 ]. Women were treated with probiotic/synbiotic preparations during the third trimester of gestation in most of the trials (34 studies, 74%) [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 45 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 58 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean treatment duration was approximately 9 weeks, ranging from 3 weeks of duration [ 67 ] to 26 weeks [ 56 ]. Women were treated with probiotic/synbiotic preparations during the third trimester of gestation in most of the trials (34 studies, 74%) [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 45 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 58 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probiotic microorganisms have been used for a plethora of clinical indications such as lactose malabsorption, diarrhea, bowel syndrome, and infection, among others [ 6 ]. In pregnant women, the administration of these microorganisms has been proposed to alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms, improve glycemic control, reduce oxidative stress, and lower the incidence of asthma, atopic sensitization, and allergic disease in offspring, among other outcomes [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. However, clinical evidence remains far from conclusive [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a previous meta-analysis of 1119 participants from 15 studies reported that probiotics and synbiotics could decrease HOMA-IR and serum insulin levels and improve glucose metabolism in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. 25 A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with diabetic nephropathy indicated that 8 × 10 9 CFU per day probiotic supplementation for 12 weeks helped control glycaemic metabolism. 26 Compared with placebo, probiotic supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in FPG, serum insulin and HOMA-IR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous meta-analyses explored the effects of probiotic intervention on glycemic control [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], and limited meta-analyses analyzed lipid metabolism [39,40,43,44], inflammatory [27,44], oxidative stress [27,44], and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with GDM [41,43,44]. The majority of these reviews suggested that probiotic supplementation has beneficial effects on glycemic outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other glycemic control parameters, namely fasting serum insulin, homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA-IR), and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), were not assessed. Through meta-analysis, Łagowska et al [ 37 ] observed that improvement in FPG was dependent on GDM status and women with GDM showed a significant reduction in FPG compared with women without GDM (standardized mean difference (SMD), −0.46 mg/dL; 95% CI = −0.89, −0.03; p = 0.034). However, the reduction in FPG in this meta-analysis may not reflect the true effects of probiotics because of the high heterogeneity (I 2 = 90.24%), which may be caused by the inclusion of studies that used synbiotics [ 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%