2022
DOI: 10.3390/w14030478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of Extreme Value Modeling for Extreme Rainfall Using Large-Scale Climate Modes and Considering Model Uncertainty

Abstract: Extreme value modeling for extreme rainfall is one of the most important processes in the field of hydrology. For the improvement of extreme value modeling and its physical meaning, large-scale climate modes have been widely used as covariates of distribution parameters, as they can physically account for climate variability. This study proposes a novel procedure for extreme value modeling of rainfall based on the significant relationship between the long-term trend of the annual maximum (AM) daily rainfall an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the non-stationarity of the long-term evolution (in our case the SST warming) breaks this hypothesis, invalidating its use. To treat the non-stationarity with such approaches, continuous time evolving baselines have been introduced in quite recent studies in other areas and contexts (Scannell et al, 2016;Sigauke and Bere, 2017;Tebaldi et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2022). The purpose of detrending is thus analogous to the shifting baseline approach (Oliver et al, 2021;Amaya et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the non-stationarity of the long-term evolution (in our case the SST warming) breaks this hypothesis, invalidating its use. To treat the non-stationarity with such approaches, continuous time evolving baselines have been introduced in quite recent studies in other areas and contexts (Scannell et al, 2016;Sigauke and Bere, 2017;Tebaldi et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2022). The purpose of detrending is thus analogous to the shifting baseline approach (Oliver et al, 2021;Amaya et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One popular approach is to apply different non-stationary models to non-stationary data and select an appropriate model based on model diagnostics. Due to its adaptability to changes in the data structure, maximum-likelihood estimation of non-stationary model parameters is usually used for this purpose [50,51,53,54]. To date, this approach has been widely studied and can be described as a 'user-friendly' method.…”
Section: Fitting the Gev Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prahadchai et al (2022) (5) built sixteen non-stationary models for time-dependent functions of the location and scale parameters of the GEV to the annual maximum (AM) daily and 2-day precipitation data observed from Thailand. Kim et al (2022) (6) present a new method for modeling extreme rainfall values in South Korea, this procedure identifies significant seasonal climate indices (SCIs) that influence the longterm trend of AM daily rainfall using statistical techniques such as ensemble empirical mode decomposition and then selects an appropriate GEV distribution among stationary and nonstationary GEVs using time and SCIs as covariates. Wang et al (2022) (7) developed a new non-stationary standardized runoff index by combining climate indices and modified reservoir index as explanatory variables using the generalized additive model for location, scale, and shape for the hydrological drought inspection of the Hanjiang River basin in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%