2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2009.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of electrochemical and thermal stability of LiFePO4 cathode modified by CeO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(37 reference statements)
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the physical meaning of the chemical diffusion coefficient D Li + as a function of the composition in the situation of two-phase coexistence becomes obscure. However, in the literature, we can easily find D Li + for intercalation systems with two-phase reactions [18,24,25,30]. In these cases, the obtained diffusion coefficients from EIS and GITT measurement, may be taken as an effective measure which reflects the intensity of long-and short-range interactions between the intercalated species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the physical meaning of the chemical diffusion coefficient D Li + as a function of the composition in the situation of two-phase coexistence becomes obscure. However, in the literature, we can easily find D Li + for intercalation systems with two-phase reactions [18,24,25,30]. In these cases, the obtained diffusion coefficients from EIS and GITT measurement, may be taken as an effective measure which reflects the intensity of long-and short-range interactions between the intercalated species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the promising cathode materials for aqueous rechargeable Li-ion battery, LiFePO 4 has been investigated in various aqueous electrolytes with different methods by many research groups [18,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the apparent lithium ion diffusion coefficient vary from 4.92 Â 10 À 11 to 1.69 Â 10 À 10 cm 2 s À 1 during charge and from 3.59 Â 10 À 11 to 1.12 Â 10 À 10 cm 2 s À 1 during discharge depending on the MoO 2 content. Sample D gives the highest value of 1.69 Â 10 À 10 cm 2 s À 1 during charge and 1.11 Â 10 À 10 cm 2 s À 1 during discharge, and they are higher than CeO 2 modified LiFePO 4 /C composites [21] and V 2 O 3 modified LiFePO 4 /C composites [23] and ZnO incorporated LiFePO 4 cathode materials [31]. It is found that the apparent lithium ion diffusion coefficient in the charge process is slightly larger than in the discharge process, it is clarified that the discharge process in LiFePO 4 is slower than the charge process.…”
Section: Apparent Lithium Ion Diffusion Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Li et al [20] proposed that SiO 2 coated LiFePO 4 /C effectively enhanced the cycling capacity and reduced capacity fading at high temperature and alleviated the cell impedance. Liu et al reported that the electrochemical lithiumion deintercalation-intercalation processes of CeO 2 modified LiFePO 4 electrodes were improved compared to the pristine www.elsevier.com/locate/ceramint LiFePO 4 electrode [21]. CuO and carbon co-coated LiFePO 4 was reported by Cui et al [22], the study found that the co-coating reduced the capacity fading and the interfacial resistances and the polarization of the cathode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%