2020
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2020.3004925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of DDM Preprocessing for the Simulation of the GRAVES Radar Densified Sparse Array for Space Surveillance and Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This particularity comes from the fact that we have chosen to assign a computing core to each sub-domain even to those of smaller size located in the lens. A significant reduction in memory occupation could be obtained by allocating several sub-domains to a computing core as proposed in [21]. Finaly, we gain a factor of 10 in simulation time at 20 GHz an a factor of 26 at 30 GHz compared to the MLFMM, but the strategy for using the computational cores (which is not optimal here) for this FETI-2LM simulation requires 303 more memory than MLFMM method.…”
Section: Table V Configurations Of Machines Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This particularity comes from the fact that we have chosen to assign a computing core to each sub-domain even to those of smaller size located in the lens. A significant reduction in memory occupation could be obtained by allocating several sub-domains to a computing core as proposed in [21]. Finaly, we gain a factor of 10 in simulation time at 20 GHz an a factor of 26 at 30 GHz compared to the MLFMM, but the strategy for using the computational cores (which is not optimal here) for this FETI-2LM simulation requires 303 more memory than MLFMM method.…”
Section: Table V Configurations Of Machines Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, our domain decomposition implementation (number of unknowns in the sub-domain) is not optimal for this TA simulation. As a consequence we can optimize the use of the memory of each of the computational cores following the procedure recently proposed in [21] resulting in important savings in memory and computation time. Indeed, based on the Tab.…”
Section: Table V Configurations Of Machines Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the methodology to extract the scattering matrix of the array is based on a mix of periodic approximations (for the center elements) and partial local embedded zones for the border elements of the array. In this work, so as to efficiently calculate the embedded radiation patterns of all the radiating elements (internal and boundary radiating elements) as well as the complete Scattering Matrix [6] of the array, we discuss the interest of the implementation of the FETI-2LM domain decomposition methods taking into account the finitude o f t he a rray on massively parallel computers initially developed in [14] and optimized in [15] and [16] for large size sparse arrays. The main goal is to implement a method allowing in a first step to calculate the radiating elements radiation patterns and the GSM of the array, and in a second post processing step to calculate the gain patterns of the antenna array for azimuth and elevation scanning directions while taking into account the active reflection c oefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%