2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-019-03012-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of daily precipitation estimations using PRISM with inverse-distance weighting

Abstract: Improved daily precipitation estimations were attempted using the parameter-elevation regressions on a parameter-elevation regression on independent slopes model (PRISM) with inverse-distance weighting (IDW) and a precipitation-masking algorithm for precipitation areas. The PRISM (PRISM_ORG) suffers two overestimation problems when the daily precipitation is estimated: overestimation of the precipitation intensity in mountainous regions and overestimation of the local precipitation areas. In order to solve the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PRISM data captured the measured precipitation well, with a R 2 ranging from .75 to .96, which indicated that the PRISM rainfall captured 75-96% of the gauged rainfall variability with an average of 91% and a median of 93%. Similar performance of PRISM data was reported in mountainous areas, including Kandal, Cambodia (Lee et al, 2014); South Korea (Jeong et al, 2020); and the northwestern corner of Washington State, United States (Currier et al, 2017). Overall, the PRISM data are well situated in mountainous terrains because the data incorporate a conceptual framework that considers orographic precipitation (Daly et al, 1994).…”
Section: Effects Of Rainfall Designations On Model Performancesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The PRISM data captured the measured precipitation well, with a R 2 ranging from .75 to .96, which indicated that the PRISM rainfall captured 75-96% of the gauged rainfall variability with an average of 91% and a median of 93%. Similar performance of PRISM data was reported in mountainous areas, including Kandal, Cambodia (Lee et al, 2014); South Korea (Jeong et al, 2020); and the northwestern corner of Washington State, United States (Currier et al, 2017). Overall, the PRISM data are well situated in mountainous terrains because the data incorporate a conceptual framework that considers orographic precipitation (Daly et al, 1994).…”
Section: Effects Of Rainfall Designations On Model Performancesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…First, we used only 34 meteorological station data to downscale CMIP5 simulations. Second, it is recommended to use an advanced method such as PRISM (e.g., Daly et al ., 2002; Daly, 2006; Jeong et al ., 2020) for the preparation of finer resolution reference data and downscaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the rainfall in a range, the greater the likelihood of a flood. In this research, the highest 16-day rainfall during the last 3 years at 30 stations in and around the study area was used to generate the rainfall pattern map using the Inverse Distance Weight technique [68]. The rainfall map (Figure 3a), with 142 mm in the northern areas and 620 mm in the central and southeastern areas, was interpolated through the station of the regional gauges rain in ArcGIS software.…”
Section: River Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%