Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing; ISSN 2084-4735 2017
DOI: 10.5277/ppmp170242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of chalcopyrite atmospheric leaching using controlled slurry potential and additive treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these elements, we studied the impact of 1.2–1.6 mm glass beads at 400 g·L –1 on the leaching of a chalcopyrite concentrate in a sulfuric acid solution. These conditions are thus different from previous studies , implementing smaller (<200 μm) and lower quantities (<50 g·L –1 ) of silica particles. According to the Pourbaix diagram for the CuFeS 2 -H 2 O system, to dissolve copper from chalcopyrite, a pH lower than 4 and a potential higher than 400 mV vs SHE are required.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on these elements, we studied the impact of 1.2–1.6 mm glass beads at 400 g·L –1 on the leaching of a chalcopyrite concentrate in a sulfuric acid solution. These conditions are thus different from previous studies , implementing smaller (<200 μm) and lower quantities (<50 g·L –1 ) of silica particles. According to the Pourbaix diagram for the CuFeS 2 -H 2 O system, to dissolve copper from chalcopyrite, a pH lower than 4 and a potential higher than 400 mV vs SHE are required.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Dong et al also reported a noticeable improvement of copper bioleaching with 50 g·L –1 fine quartz particles (<43 μm) in the leach solution. Jafari et al added 10–40 g·L –1 silica particles (<200 μm) in the leaching reactor at 80 °C and observed a small improvement of leaching yield, together with a much cleaner grain surface at the microscopic scale. They concluded that the increase in copper yield was due to the combination of mechanical friction and collision that reduced the passive layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%