2013
DOI: 10.14569/ijarai.2013.020405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of Automated Detection Method for Clustered Microcalcification Based on Wavelet Transformation and Support Vector Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selected Features were then fed to linear SVM classifier. Compared to the results reported by Zhang et al [21], Arai et al [22] and Simon et al [23], the proposed system achieved the highest performance measures, as seen in table 1. However, Gurcan et al [10] outperformed all studies in comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selected Features were then fed to linear SVM classifier. Compared to the results reported by Zhang et al [21], Arai et al [22] and Simon et al [23], the proposed system achieved the highest performance measures, as seen in table 1. However, Gurcan et al [10] outperformed all studies in comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…To the latest of our knowledge, Zhang et al [21] and Simon et al [23] used MIAS database which contains only 25 images with microcalcifications while Arai et al [22] employed dataset from Japanese Society of Medical Imaging Technology (JAMIT) comprising 12 microcalcifications images. In addition, Gurcan et al [10] used Nijmegen database with 40 microcalification images Compared to the dataset used in our study, the comparison is still fair as the proposed system can be considered as more robust algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arai et al [4] separated the database taken from Japanese Society of Computer Aided Medical Imaging Technology into two parts, training and testing with the data proportion were 74% and 26%, respectively. The author used the features that are mostly statistical including mean, variance, max, coefficient of variation, standard deviation, and two additional features, 7 Hu moments and centroid.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various image processing techniques are useful for the detection of microcalcification [6,7] and classification of cancer as benign and malignant using textural and shape features. A wide literature survey reveals that the conventional approach for detecting and classifying microcalcification involves enhancement [8,9], followed by segmentation [10,11], feature extraction [12], and classification [13]. In general, X-ray mammograms [14], sonograms [15], computed tomography [16], and magnetic resonance imaging [17] are the tools used for detecting breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%