2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cvi.2016.0058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of affine iterative closest point algorithm for partial registration

Abstract: In this study, partial registration problem with outliers and missing data in the affine case is discussed. To solve this problem, a novel objective function is proposed based on bidirectional distance and trimmed strategy, and then a new affine trimmed iterative closest point algorithm is given. First, when bidirectional distance measurement is applied, the ill‐posed partial registration problem in the affine case is prevented. Second, the overlapping percentage is solved by using trimmed strategy which uses … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This section further verifies the accuracy and robustness of the proposed algorithm through experiments. First, the proposed algorithm is verified by simulation experiments, and we compare it with the ICP algorithm [ 15 ], the ICP algorithm with color information (CICP) [ 36 ], the scaling ICP algorithm (SICP) [ 49 ], the affine ICP algorithm (AICP) [ 50 ], and the affine algorithm with correntropy (ACICP) [ 51 , 52 ], GeoTransformer(Geo) [ 33 ], respectively. Among them, the simulation experiments include single objects and indoor scenes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section further verifies the accuracy and robustness of the proposed algorithm through experiments. First, the proposed algorithm is verified by simulation experiments, and we compare it with the ICP algorithm [ 15 ], the ICP algorithm with color information (CICP) [ 36 ], the scaling ICP algorithm (SICP) [ 49 ], the affine ICP algorithm (AICP) [ 50 ], and the affine algorithm with correntropy (ACICP) [ 51 , 52 ], GeoTransformer(Geo) [ 33 ], respectively. Among them, the simulation experiments include single objects and indoor scenes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data Availability Statement: Trained models with algorithm can be available upon reasonablerequest according to the instructions in ICP algorithm [15], the ICP algorithm with color information (CICP) [36], the scaling ICP algorithm (SICP) [49], the affine ICP algorithm (AICP) [50], and the affine algorithm with correntropy (ACICP) [51,52], GeoTransformer(Geo) [33].…”
Section: Funding: Lianyungang International Automobile Green Intellig...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El proceso de estimación de parámetros se realiza calculando el valor de los coeficientes del modelo examinado a partir del conjunto de datos de las observaciones del error medio, para determinar si el modelo teórico propuesto es aceptable como una representación aproximada que se ajusta de la mejor forma a los datos (Dong, Cai & Du, 2016;Xu, Boerner & Yao, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…The widely used coarse registration methods include: Point signature [3], spin image [4], shape context [5], fast point feature histograms (FPFH) [6], normal vectors/principal curvature/curvature change [7][8][9], geometric primitives [10][11][12], etc. The most popular fine registration method is the ICP algorithm [13,14] and its variants [15][16][17][18]. ICP is the iterative closest point algorithm.…”
Section: Registration Techniques Of Point Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%